Epstein Secrets

izes travel for the purpose of knowingly engaging in unlawful sexual activity with minors. United States Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 638 (3d Cir. 2004); United Stales v Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006). This is the highest level of culpability in the four tier hierarchy of culpability that the Model Pen

ternational travel, left untouched the,standard for domestic travel, and thus underscores the strict standard needed for a prosecution in this area. See United States I Clark, 435 F.3d 1100, 1104- 05 (9°' Cir. 2006). 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000735 EFTA00184609 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-43 Entered o

thern District of Florida February 1, 2007 Page 22 Clause imposes real limitations on Congress's power to criminalize essentially local behavior. See United States' Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000) (Violence Against Women Act exceeded Congressional power under the Commerce Clause or § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment)

Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual

as since the cameras were installed in 2003, with the help of the PBPD, to address the then of cash from Epstein's home. This fact is detailed in a Palm Beach Police Report prepared in October 2003 detailing the thefts, the installation of video equipment, the video recording capturing Alessi (then Epstein's house mana

ly desires that result, whatever the likelihood of that result happening from his conduct." United Stalest Bailey, 444 U.S. 394, 404 (1980), quoting United States' United States Gypsum Co., 438 U.S. 422, 445 (1978).7 The Supreme Court has repeatedly interpreted this language to require that the illegal activity

to which the legislation is addressed. After all, it is a first principle that the Constitution creates a federal government of enumerated powers. See United States v.= 514 U.S. 549, 552 (1995) ("Just as the separation and independence of the coordinate branches of the Federal Government serve to prevent the a

s since the cameras were installed in 2003, with the help of the PBPD, to address the theft of cash from Epstein's home. This fact is detailed in a Palm Beach Police Report prepared in October 2003 detailing the thefts, the installation of video equipment, the video recording capturing Alessi (then Epstein's house mana

enforcement." Indeed, the victim reported having been told: "Those who help him will be compensated and those who hurt him will be dealt with." See Palm Beach Police Report (Ex. C). And Epstein's efforts to influence witnesses continue to this day. As in the past, within recent months. he paid significant amounts of m

iction.") (citing United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670, 672 (2d Cir. 1985) (per curiam)). Moreover, any references in an NPA to the "Government" or the "United States" do not abrogate these principles. Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672 ("[A] plea agreement whereby a federal prosecutor agrees that 'the Government' will dism

ngs in this case or protect the safety of the community, and that any application for bail should be denied. Very truly yours, GEOF REY S. BERMAN United tates Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tel: (212) 637-2415 / 2225 / 2324 Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Re

's application for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (sa

enforcement." Indeed, the victim reported having been told: "Those who help him will be compensated and those who hurt him will be dealt with." See Palm Beach Police Report (Ex. C). And Epstein's efforts to influence witnesses continue to this day. As in the past, within recent months. he paid significant amounts of m

iction.") (citing United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670, 672 (2d Cir. 1985) (per curiam)). Moreover, any references in an NPA to the "Government" or the "United States" do not abrogate these principles. Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672 ("[A] plea agreement whereby a federal prosecutor agrees that 'the Government' will dism