Epstein Secrets

case, the requested person has executed an irrevocable waiver of his/her right to contest extradition and is present in France only because she fled the United States in violation of her bail conditions. (Part II). 2 At p. 27 of the transcript. 5 www.wjavocats.com • palais C1652 EFTA00065680 William JULIE av

Exhibit V EFTA00065675 William JULIE avocet a la coin — attorney at law Ghislaine Maxwell Opinion on French Extradition Law OVERVIEW • This report was written pursuant to a request f

case, the requested person has executed an irrevocable waiver of his/her right to contest extradition and is present in France only because she fled the United States in violation of her bail conditions. (Part II). 2 At p. 27 of the transcript. 5 www.wjavocats.com • palais C1652 EFTA00154448 William JULIE av

Exhibit V EFTA00154443 William JULIE avocet a la coin — attorney at law Ghislaine Maxwell Opinion on French Extradition Law OVERVIEW • This report was written pursuant to a request f

seek the protection of the French Courts to fight • 75017 paris • tel. — fax. www.wjavocats.com • palais C1652 EFTA00011222 --- PAGE BREAK --- William JULIE avocet a la cour — attorney at law any extradition request from the US Government to the competent French Authorities ("The Waiver"). (See Exhibit

12 EFTA00011233 --- PAGE BREAK --- William JULIE avocet a la cour — attorney at law Part II — The likely outcome of an extradition request from the United States of America to France in the case of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell 33. In this case, if an extradition request were to be transmitted by the USA against Ms Ghislaine Ma

no obligation upon the Requested State to grant the extradition of a person who is a national of the Requested State, but the executive authority of the United States shall have the power to surrender a national of the United States if, in its discretion, it deems it proper to do so. The nationality of the person

ionality must be assessed at the time of commission of the offense and not at the time of the extradition request. As discussed in the opinion from William Julie, French legal counsel (attached as Exhibit A), the government's assertion is entirely incorrect for the following reasons: • The government's argum

ited States of America and the European Union s ivied in Washington on 25 June 2003, and the Instalment Amending the Treaty of 23 Apnl 1996 between the United States of Amok a and France signed in the Hague on 30 September 2004. 2 51, RUE AmvERE • 75017 RARis tee. 01 88 33 51 80 — FAX. 01 88 33 51 81 wjeJwjavocats.com •