Epstein Secrets

2:44 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Case 9:08-cv,80736-KA.ocurnen\ 48-5 Emered on FLSD Do.03/21/2011 I I :sentenced not later y,an October 26, 2007-. the UnitedjStates bas 110 objection to J;:pstein seJfsreporting to begin ~rving hls sentence ·not later than January 4, 2008. • 12. Epstein agrees that.he will no

lty and to ·provide compensation in the tQanner aescribed ab()ye, ifEpsteirt successfully fulfills allt>fthe tenns ~ _conditi9M of this agreement, the United Stat~s 1,1~0 agrees that it will niH institute: BilY criminal charges against any potential ~~onspirators ofEpstein, inclµding but not limited toi Sarah Ke

offense includcs; ;but is net limitadto; a conviction liy a foderabor miUtary'tribunal,-including courts-martial conducted by the Armed Forcos of tho United Status,, >and includes a conviction-orentry of a ploa of',guilty or nolo contendere resulting in a-sanctiun in anyistato of dio United-States or other juris

he gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. Ifthe United States receives a Freedom ofInformation Act request or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to Epstein

ll.· .. attempt to obstruct justice, or ... to threaten, injure, or intimidate, a prospective witness or juror." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(t)(2)(B); see also United States v. Friedman, 837 F.2d 48 (2d Cir. 1988). The Bail Reform Act lists four factors to be considered in the detention analysis: (1) the nature and circ

text of the agreement purports to bind “the Government.” See Annabi, Tl\ F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (“Defendant’s argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it

, it appears that; on 3 -the dale of.February 16, 2006, there's a meeting 4 that takes place between the investigator Joseph 5 Recafey and two women, Joanna Harrison and.a 6 Victoria Bean. Do you see that? 7 MR. CRITTON: Are we at 79? 8 MR. KUVIN: Yeah. 9 THE. WITNESS: Yes, 10 BY MR. KUVIN: 11 Q Okay. Did you lear

1 of 7 EXHIBIT 37 EFTA00184577 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-37 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 7 U.S. Department of Justice United Stales Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LIP Citigroup Center New York, New York 100

ustralian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 aesimt June 30, 2008 NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIMS NOTICE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 3509(d) AND FLORIDA LAW, THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT IS TO BE TREATED AS CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED EXCEPT IN CONNECTION WITH

Reported By: RECAREY, JOSEPH 2/14/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 2/16/06 On Friday, February 3, 2006, I had made arrangements to meet with Joanna Harrison at the Palm Reach Police Station. At approximately 1:00pm, Harrison and her friend, Victoria Bean arrived at the police station. During an intervie

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CIV-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Do

11-Glenn, 12:30 chicken, Melissa 4, 3 September B & J, Big Screen x8, Johanna w r Sunday @ 4pM,IIIIII Monday after school?; left message for fORa Joanna Harrison, Rhian on; Sandy works 4-9 Monday and Tuesday, leaves school 40 11:30 AM; will be here tomorrow @ 10:30 Am; Mrs. Business 654-6699 Karen;833-4533.