Epstein Secrets

2:44 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Case 9:08-cv,80736-KA.ocurnen\ 48-5 Emered on FLSD Do.03/21/2011 I I :sentenced not later y,an October 26, 2007-. the UnitedjStates bas 110 objection to J;:pstein seJfsreporting to begin ~rving hls sentence ·not later than January 4, 2008. • 12. Epstein agrees that.he will no

lty and to ·provide compensation in the tQanner aescribed ab()ye, ifEpsteirt successfully fulfills allt>fthe tenns ~ _conditi9M of this agreement, the United Stat~s 1,1~0 agrees that it will niH institute: BilY criminal charges against any potential ~~onspirators ofEpstein, inclµding but not limited toi Sarah Ke

offense includcs; ;but is net limitadto; a conviction liy a foderabor miUtary'tribunal,-including courts-martial conducted by the Armed Forcos of tho United Status,, >and includes a conviction-orentry of a ploa of',guilty or nolo contendere resulting in a-sanctiun in anyistato of dio United-States or other juris

he gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. Ifthe United States receives a Freedom ofInformation Act request or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to Epstein

ll.· .. attempt to obstruct justice, or ... to threaten, injure, or intimidate, a prospective witness or juror." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(t)(2)(B); see also United States v. Friedman, 837 F.2d 48 (2d Cir. 1988). The Bail Reform Act lists four factors to be considered in the detention analysis: (1) the nature and circ

text of the agreement purports to bind “the Government.” See Annabi, Tl\ F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (“Defendant’s argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it

~S?ld, :ir1 •.tt,e Circuit. 'and' Stat~ af<>resaid_; :COUNT ONE· ·F~LONY·souciTA'T'ION OF,RF{osr1tut10.N· on•or ab~ut_orbetwe.en,tt,~:HS!.day ·at Augustin the._y~ar.of, our t;.or~,Tw9'Thousanda_nr:J Four-~rid•Qct<:>t>t'3r :31,, :·2oqs,:c:t1d ~qlicJt;Jriquc::~. ent!c~; .6( prqcure.af!6therto commit .P'9

se advise =f it is ok to send the email below. Thanks. Darren Ms. S. Pinney Territoria= SOR Program Manager Virgin Islands Department of Justice United Sta=es Virgin Islands Re: Mr. Jeffrey Epstein - Tra=el Notice Dear Ms. Pinney: =his is to advise you of a further modification to=span> Mr. Epstein's

ke <[email protected]>=wrote: Please see below for your appr=val a proposed modification notice which I will email to Ms. Pinney and cc=Mr. Augustin upon receipt of your ok. The notice sets forth the foll=wing travel plans. Stay in PB until Mar 8 NY on Mar 8 PB on Mar 11 USVI on Mar 14. Pleas

2 F.3d 274 (1st Cir. QOOS) crecccseesccccsneececcsnseceseseseeescsesecesnseseeesnseseesnsescesnsesecesnseseeesnseeeeesnseeeeanseeet United States v. Augustin, 661 F.3d 1105 (11th Cir. 2011) ..... United States v. Bahlul, No. 09-001, 2011 U.S. CMCR LEXIS 3 (CMCR Sept. 9, 2011) eececcsssssssneessssnseseessne

es.*! As a result of al Kadi’s deep involvement in sponsoring al-Qaeda, through Muwafaq as well as various businesses under his control or influence, the *41 United States listed him as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist on October 12, 2001.” Read in context and collectively, the allegations concerning the chariti

18th-century paradigms.” Jd. at 724-25. In making this determination, courts should consider “the potential implications for the foreign relations of the United *122 States” and should be “wary of impinging on the discretion of the Legislative and Executive Branches in managing foreign affairs.” Jd. at 727. In cases dec