Epstein Secrets

contrast brine de crielita PUERTO RICO Retail Beefing Operatons PO Km 9146 San Icon. FR 009)6-C144 787.715.251 V 11366.695.2513 2f dobankrom UNITED PATES VIRGROSIANDS FEMBent PO Bor 30.1600 St Trais" VIBORD1 1.56.169S 25I If/WU* oam CONFIDENTI41„, BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS Fhpflank PO Bar 435

gos de eelile eGeral•etlii). PAM SABER SI SE HA EfECTUA00 UN DEPOSIT° DIRECT°. Si wed na autor Imo. oeoosaos wreath a sew went. oara Ms codes no le :Kasten cordinewoOn oar escrno. twecke hamarnbs al :Knee° gee se incr aaaio oara informarehn sobras !slot ye han real :MO. PAM REPORTAR PERMIT* 0 ROBO DE

ad will twee as 'Price was not avtlet4e• if we at unable to obtan a price foe a seamy - Deposit' a securities denominated ilcutrarcies otter thin U.S &Has art reflected at the (whinge rate as of the statement date. - fcr certain searOes radng n non-conformrg denornnations, price and quantity (face

comples and accurate n all other respects if not abraded so in yeeteg sthin 60 days • Please deed outromer complaints or trees to to FimY C lent Kasten (Sonnet at 201252-1699 a tolltroe r. 9003549103, 8.03 A.M. to 6C0 P.M ET Monday through Friday. or in micro to1.125 Fiend* Semites 1x., Client Rel

in the case). The U.S. Attorney's Office has generally disputed some of these allegations without offering specifics as to what happened. See, e.g., United States' Response to Jane Doe #1 & Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victim Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Reme

ica Inc., No. H-07-434, 2008 WL 501321, at 11 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted)). 2 Td. at 11. 53 See supra Part IITA. 4 Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 131 S.Ct. 1325, 1331 (2011). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017621 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 19 of 31 104

following circumstances: CVRA rights attach when an officer or employee of the Department of Justice or any other department or agency of the United States engaged in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime has substantial evidence that an identifiable person has been directly and proximate

t) the following circumstances: CVRA rights attach when an officer or employee of the Department of Justice or any other department or agency of the United States engaged in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime has substantial evidence that an identifiable person has been directly and pr

in the case). The U.S. Attorney’s Office has generally disputed some of these allegations without offering specifics as to what happened. See, e.g., United States’ Response to Jane Doe #1 & Jane Doe #2’s Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victim Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Reme

a Inc., No. H-07-434, 2008 WL 501321, at *11 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted)). % Id. at 11. 3 See supra Part IIL.A. 4 Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 131 S. Ct. 1325, 1331 (2011). HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014064 --- PAGE BREAK --- 86 CASSELL ET AL. [Vol. 104 r

endment prosecution also make clear that a later court hearing would start such a prosecution. For instance, in the Fourth Circuit case cited by OLC, United States v. Alvarado, the court reasons that “the main reason a law enforcement officer files [] a complaint is to establish probable cause for an arrest warr