Epstein Secrets

e less than $5,000,000.00; 10. That this Court has jurisdiction over said assets as they originated in the United States; That the treaties between the United Stales and the Cayman Islands and related governments clearly establishes the right of the United Slates to seize such assets. That counsel for MORSE has

d to as RRA) was a legal entity organized under the laws of the State of Florida and constituted an Enterprise as that term is defined in Title 18, United States Cod; Section 1961(4). The Enterprise engaged in, and the activities of which affected, interstate and foreign commerce. THE RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY 3.

t of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, did knowingly conspire, confederate, and agree with persons known and unknown to the United States Attorney, to commit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956 and I957, that is: i. to knowing

d in the United States; That the treaties between the United Stales and the Cayman Islands and related governments clearly establishes the right of the United Slates to seize such assets. That counsel for MORSE has facilitated the contact between the relative governments and as a Page 2 of 6 EFTA00223350 resu

FTA00223282 Epstein 1RRA, et al. Page S6 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Borger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which had no bearing o

as a Page 2 of 6 EFTA00795670 result,. this Court has received clear and convincing evidence that such funds will be immediately transferred to the United Stales: 12. That the Clerk of Court is hereby directed to immediately submit the proper A documentation to the appropriate bank of the Cayman Islands to

of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, /SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, 1,1eZNIK did knowingly conspi federate, and agree with persons known and unknown to the United States Atto mmit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code1S 1956 and 1957, that is: i. to knowingly conduct and a

ation of Title 18, United States Code, Selo 34 and 1343, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957. All in violation of Title 18, United Sta ection I 956(h). (Mail and Wi ud C nspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1349) 1. The General All d paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count I of the Information are r

A00795602 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which had no bearing o

, will take the video deposition of: NAME AJ DiScala DATE AND TIME PLACE Wednesday May 25, 2011 10:30 a.m. Dewey I,eBoeuf 1301 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 *The deponent has been instructed to bring with him all documents listed in Schedule A attached hereto. upon oral examination

nts of the former Rothstein law firm regarding investment opportunities in any claim or litigation against Jeffrey Epstein: a) Scott Rothstein b) Russell Adler c) William Berger d) Bradley Edwards e) Michael Fisten f) Kenneth Jenne g) David Baden h) Deborah Villegas i) Andrew Barnett j) Patrick k) R

o Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131 48' Lesley Groff c/o Mike Miller 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 49. Dave Rogers c/o Bruce Reinhart 505 S. Flagler Drive, Ste 300 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 50. c/o Adam Horowitz FARMER,

25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131 83. David Co field (David Seth Kokin) LAS VEGAS, NV 89135 84. 85 Michael Fisten Weston, FL 86 Russell Adler Delray Beach, FL 87. Marie Alessi BOYTON BEACH, FL 33472 88. Janusz Banasiak 358 EL BRILLO WAY PALM BEACH FL, 33480 89. Beata Banasiak 358

Q: Have the only conversations that you have had with Ms. Marie Villfana or Villafana, have they only been in the context of Jane Doe 1 and 2 versus United States of America, only in the context of that case? Id. at page 216; line 9-13. 11 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 3330I• 954.467.1223

the manner in which the cases were handled while Edwards was a partner at RRA: Q: The one meeting that you had in Mr., Mr. Rothstein's office with Russell Adler and some unknown person on the phone, were you given any direction at that time that certain discovery should be done or certain tactics should be

t of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, did knowingly conspire, confederate, and agree with persons known and unknown to the United States Attorney, to commit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956 and 1957, that is: i. to knowing

A00596503 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which had no bearing o

t of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, did knowingly conspire, confederate, and agree with persons known and unknown to the United States Attorney, to commit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956 and 1957, that is: i. to knowing

A00729418 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which had no bearing o

Q: Have the only conversations that you have had with Ms. Marie Villfana or Villafana, have they only been in the context of Jane Doe 1 and 2 versus United States of America, only in the context of that case? Id. at page 216; line 9-13. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection. Id. at page 216; line 14. Q: And I will separate out th

the manner in which the cases were handled while Edwards was a partner at RRA: Q: The one meeting that you had in Mr., Mr. Rothstein's office with Russell Adler and some unknown person on the phone, were you given any direction at that time that certain discovery should be done or certain tactics should be

t of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, did knowingly conspire, confederate, and agree with persons knowp and unknown to the United States Attorney, to commit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United. States Code, Sections 1956 and 1957, that is: i. to knowin

TA00193786 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which had no bearing o