Epstein Secrets

i...ernameedklestads_accouncideAC0111040620221012261ds_upgradeablewno Page 2 or 2 EFTA00605720 ' Palm Beach Daily News Archives 417111 1:32 PM PalmBeach 0 see 0 wen HOME trEv..5 CDC* n Burch for Palm Beath ClaW New Follow igglinyaheat on Trilled . NEWS Reigron I Wctines I21 E.nseal Its pa

ts in civil cases. They are among more than hvo-dozom uneerage girls who Hod awstats settled dawns against Epstein. alleging they wore lured to his Palm Beach mansion to give him sexually charged massages andfor sex n exchange for money. The motion filed Monday says the agreement is alegal because the go

cKenna reserved ruLng on whether the recording will be re'eased to atierneYs representing young women who were sexually abused by Epstein as mfrors. McKenna didn't Wen to the recanting tiring the hearing. Fon Lauderdale attorney Bald Edwards and Utah allomey and low professor Paul Casten ors flghtng to

350LCOS Date DesalptIon Attorney Producedto0e3ense 3501.02504 through 062 Various sans records for WA 2021 C4 12 3501025053 2006 07 13 Pan Beach Police Meant incident Report 2021.01 12 3503.025.064 2007.06.02 Search result for 2021.04.12 3501 25.065 2006 06.08 10 memorandum to documen

79 2007.06.04 Letter from to 2021.0412 3501.056080 2006.08.05 FBI memorandum to docament Warm information 2021.0412 3501455-061 2006.07'26 Pali Beach Pace °apartment Evidence/Property Trackers Reran 2021.04.12 3501455.062 2006.06.25 Pan Beach Police Department property receipt 2021.04.12 3501

Monism/ 302 3501.142-01 2020.0x15 nternew notes 3501.10-01 2019.11.01 Intones" 301 3501.10-000 2019.11.01 Intoning Notes 3501.148 eatrkk McKenna DM Dosciptkes 39)1 148 0)1 2006.11.11 Florida DAVID. indnidual summary page for Patoct McKenna 3501148 032 2006.11.11 Florida DAY.I.D.IndhIdu

rs that he that he was "one of M's many `Johns.— See Complaint Epstein v. Rothstein, Edwards & M s, No. 50 2009 CA0 40800 (Cir. Ct., 15th Jud. Cir., Palm Beach Co.. Dec. 7, 2009) at 146(a), pertinent pages annexed as Ex. E to the Carroll Reply Dec1.12 As for alleged "derogatory remarks" about M., they would s

nally required, or rooted in federal common law"); Persky v. Yeshiva Univ. No. 01 Civ. 4278 (LMM), 2002 WL 31769704, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2002) (McKenna. J.) ("This circuit has long recognized the existence of a qualified privilege for journalistic information. This privilege is based. at least in p