Epstein Secrets

asking Epstein to identify information potentially related to the case(s) including, but not limited to, all employees who performed work inside his Palm Beach residence, all other employees who came to the residence (Interrogatory Nos. 1 — 2), those who gave or were asked to give him massages (Interrogator

nformal, where the answers might incriminate him in future proceedings." See Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985) (citing Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77 (1973)). The privilege is accorded liberal construction in favor of the right and extends not only to answers that would support a

entirely reasonable for Epstein to assert that forcing him to testify as to anyone who came or went to his Palm Beach mansion or was employed at his Palm Beach mansion (Interrogatories 1-2), the identity of persons providing transport services (Interrogatory No. 9), and his employee's telephone numbers (Int

al, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings." Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985)(citing Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70. 77 (1973)). The privilege is accorded "liberal construction in favor of the right it was intended to secure," Hoffman v. United State

DY SCARS ON ...: WRIST ON JANUARY 29, 1998 AT APPROXIMATELY 1815 HOURS, I RESPONDED TO 12959 EFTA_R1_02032506 EFTA02691123 4541 02/0//07 ENB2 PALM Bi ACH COUNTY SHERIFF' S OFF/ CE PAGE 2 OFFENSE REPORT CASE NO. 98027604 RACKLEY ROAD, LOXABATCHEE, FLORIDA REFERENCE A MISSING PERSON. UPON ARRIVA

THAT JOSHUA BUNNER WAS THERE ALSO INDICATED IN HIS INTERVIEW THAT THE SEXUAL ACTIVITY BETWEEN HE AND '. ...: :' WAS CONSENSUAL AND NOT printed by Turley"' Id 0: 1541 on Iftbruary 07, 2007 01. http://oqs.pbso.orwindex.cfmlfa=d.spease&fronwee=1&srhta=4bldblle2888a2Se-91.32CAE... 2/7/2007 E FTA_R 1_020