Epstein Secrets

t time you joined the fire and through the end of October of 2009, how would you describe the perception of the firm, the firm's reputation in the South Florida legal community? A I think it was in very high regard by the legal community. When I joined the firm, I looked up ea the Internet, articles about

Yeah. I heard of Bill Scharer. Bill Scherer 1 defendants? 4 is a prominent Fort Lauderdale attorney who wa➢ a 0 A Sure. 3 client. His firm Conrad Scherer -- yeah, I've 1 Q And before you would file that complaint, 10 practiced here since 1975. And I had a number of cases 10 you would make sure

hought were very, very high-caliber -- extremely high-caliber. I got to know more people there, of course. One of the clients of the firm was the Conrad Scherer firm. The Conrad Scherer firm was 20 ran by Bill Scherer. Bill Scherer la one of most 21 prominent lawyers in South Florida, certainly in 32 Se

position Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein. 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893-CIV Marra/Johnson. Rothstein returned to South Florida in November 2009 to face federal criminal charges and civil claims by private investors arising out of what was reported to be a $1.2 Billion Ponzi

]; Information Charging Scott W. Rothstein in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, 09-60331-CR-COHN On November 20, 2009, the lawfirm of Conrad Scherer filed a complaint, Razorback cause in this case, is well established by his affidavit filed in support of his original summary judgment motion. [ci

ecuting three civil cases against Epstein (the "Epstein Cases"). After RRA imploded in early November 2009, Epstein learned, along with the rest of South Florida, about the Ponzi scheme, and that it was the Epstein Cases; the very same cases brought to RRA by Edwards, that were used to fund the Ponzi scheme.

gations into approximately 40 of the 70 attorneys employed by RRA. At or about the same time in November 2009, the press reported that the law firm Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding. LLC, a at v. Scott W. Rothstein, a at, Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter the "

ecuting three civil cases against Epstein (the "Epstein Cases"). After RRA imploded in early November 2009, Epstein learned, along with the rest of South Florida, about the Ponzi scheme, and that it was the Epstein Cases; the very same cases brought to RRA by Edwards, that were used to fund the Ponzi scheme.

gations into approximately 40 of the 70 attorneys employed by RRA. At or about the same time in November 2009, the press reported that the law firm Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at, Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter the

osition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein. 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893- CIV Marra/Johnson. Rothstein returned to South Florida in November 2009 to face federal criminal charges and civil claims by private investors arising out of what was reported to be a $1.2 Billion Ponzi

d before he was criminally charged last month with using the firm to run a $1.2 billion investment racket."). On November 20, 2009, the law firm of Conrad Scherer filed a complaint, Razorback Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et aL, Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter referenced as the "Razorback Com