Epstein Secrets

had handled the case, and there is no indication that she had spoken to any of the detectives who had dealt with the victims so extensively during the Palm Beach Police Department's year-long investigation of these events. Instead, as the court pointed out, the prosecutor had relied on mere "hearsay" for the notion that the vic

l be confidential, and this document shall not be made available for public inspection. To be atgued b DEBORAH I MORSE Petu Pork i§uprente Court Appellate Division - First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Dc.fendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR

had handled the case, and there is no indication that she had spoken to any of the detectives who had dealt with the victims so extensively during the Palm Beach Police Department's year-long investigation of these events. Instead, as the court pointed out, the prosecutor had relied on mere "hearsay" for the notion that the vic

all be confidential, and this document shall not be made available for public inspection. To be argued DEBORAH L MORSE Petu Pork i§uprente Court Appellate Division - First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Dcfendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR.

had handled the case, and there is no indication that she had spoken to any of the detectives who bad dealt with the victims so extensively during the Palm Beach Police Department's year-long investigation of these events. Instead, as the court pointed out, the prosecutor had relied on mere "hearsay" for the notion that the vic

l be confidential, and this document shall not be made available for public inspection. To be argued by DEBORAH L. MORSE POD Pork 6uprente Court Appellate Division - First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant-Appellant BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR.