Epstein Secrets

s meeting. The events at issue occurred in 2004 and 2005. The matter was investigated during the course of nearly a year beginning in March 2005 by the Palm Beach County Police Department (PBPD). As will be discussed in detail below, it appears that a PBPD detective formed a view early on as to the criminality of the conduct of Jeff

er for additional contact. provided no additional in ormatxon, as it appeared her responses were almost scripted. We left the area and returned to Palm Beach Police Department. Based on the information acquired during the interviews, a search warrant was prepared for entry at the Epstein home. On October 18, 2005, I met

anyone relying on the Police Report or Probable Cause Affidavit would have a skewed view of the facts material to this matter. Examples follow. 1. The Video Surveillance Equipment Located in Epstein 'c Office and Garage. Both the Police Report (at 43) and the Probable Cause Affidavit (at 18) make particular mention of the "discovery"

h a grand jury subpoena, as the correspondence with their grand jury coordinator makes perfectly clear. With regard to your allegation of my filing the Palm Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit "with the court knowing that the public could access it," I do not know to what you are referring. Ali documents related t

t evidence. Thus. the Police Report and Pmbahle Cause Affidavit only affix a skewed view of the facts material to this matter. examples follow. 1. The Video Surveillance Equipment Located in Mr. Enteln's Office and G'arame. Ruth the Police Report (at 43) and the Probable Cause Affidavit (at IS) make RFP MIA 000449 EFTA00208930 12/

een presented to you have been materially inaccurate. As you may know. the principal witnesses in this case were first interviewed by Detective of the Palm Reach Police Department (the "PRPD") and other state law enforcement officers. 'these interviews (the -*witness statements") were ollen tape-recorded thus providing a verb

evidence. 1 has, the Police RCM* and Probable Cause Affidavit only oiler a skewed view of tlx: facts material to this matter. Examples follow. I. The Video Surveillance Equipment Located in Mr. Epstein!r Office and Garage. Ruth the Police Report (at 43) and the Probable Cause Affidavit (at 18) make EFTA00214298 12/11/2007 11:39 FA

sented to you have been materially inaccurate. As you may know. the principal witnesses in this case were first interviewed by Detective Recarey of the Palm Reach Police Department (the "PRPIT) and other state law enlbrcement officers. These interviews (the "witness statement() were olden tape-recorded thus providing a verbati

evidence. Thus, the Police Report and Probable Cause Affidavit only affix a skewed view of the facts material to this matter. Examples follow. 1. The Video Surveillance Equipment Located in Mr. Epstein's Office and Garage. Both the Police Report (at 43) and the Probable Cause Affidavit (at I make EFTA00176119 12/11/2007 11:39 FAX

s meeting. The events at issue occurred in 2004 and 2005. The matter was investigated during the course of nearly a year beginning in March 2005 by the Palm Beach County Police Department (PBPD). As will be discussed in detail below, it appears that a PBPD detective formed a view early on as to the criminality of the conduct of Jeff

anyone relying on the Police Report or Probable Cause Affidavit would have a skewed view of the facts material to this matter. Examples follow. 1. The Video Surveillance Equipment Located in Epstein's Office and Garage. Both the Police Report (at 43) and the Probable Cause Affidavit (at 18) make particular mention of the "discovery"