Epstein Secrets

. I ' ~ INRE: INVESTIGATION OF JE~YEPStEIN' ----------................. --~' N_QN~PROSECJJDON AGREEMENT IT APPEARING that {h_e ~!ty 6~ P~lz? Beach Police Department i and th~ State Attorney's Office for the ISthJud1c11il Crrcwt m and,for Pa,lrn l3eacll Co1JI1ty,(here1IU1.fter, .the "State Attorney's Office'') h

way West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Dear Mr. Krischer, Please find enclosed the probable cause affidavits and case filing packages thus, far resulting from the Palm Beach Police Department’s investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen and Haley Robson. The submission of these documents are both in response to Assistant State Attorney L

Palm B' ,: • -~,_ .- • • "! ~c ' Officcfr• FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/28/2023 2:22:44 PM ProbableCiiiiseAfjidavit Palm -Beach PolBe Department Agency-ORI# FL0 500600* statedis^nd'idle entered'through.a;glass:do^ She!was taken upstairs* to a- blaster bedroom Shefoctiliedthe master?bathi@mdiac

H COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/28/2023 2:22:44 PM I IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN_/ NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney’s Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the “State Attorney’s Office”) have conducte

or bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring “at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant’s head start”); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United Sta

tigators were still photographing the family. On April EFTA00100406 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-3 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 2 ite. 7/19/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 83 [me: 15:01:37 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Ise NO • 1-05-000368 (Continued) 10, 2006, at approximately 2:30 p.m., I served...bat her

bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United S

tigators were still photographing the family. On April EFTA00105504 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-3 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 2 ite. 7/19/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 83 [me: 15:01:37 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Ise NO • 1-05-000368 (Continued) 10, 2006, at approximately 2:30 p.m., I served...bat her

bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United S

tigators were still photographing the family. On April EFTA00068076 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-3 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 2 ate: 7/19/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 83 ime: 15:01:37 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Ise No • 1-05-000368 (Continued) 10, 2006, at approximately 2:30 p.m., I servedflat her res

bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United S

tigators were still photographing the family. On April EFTA00071700 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-3 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 2 ite. 7/19/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 83 [me: 15:01:37 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Ise NO • 1-05-000368 (Continued) 10, 2006, at approximately 2:30 p.m., I served...bat her

bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United S

tigators were still photographing the family. On April EFTA00076329 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-3 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 2 ite. 7/19/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 83 [me: 15:01:37 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Ise NO • 1-05-000368 (Continued) 10, 2006, at approximately 2:30 p.m., I served...bat her

bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United S

tigators were still photographing the family. On April EFTA00076357 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-3 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 2 ite. 7/19/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 83 [me: 15:01:37 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Ise NO • 1-05-000368 (Continued) 10, 2006, at approximately 2:30 p.m., I served...bat her

bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United S

tigators were still photographing the family. On April EFTA00078257 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-3 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 2 ite. 7/19/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 83 [me: 15:01:37 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Ise NO • 1-05-000368 (Continued) 10, 2006, at approximately 2:30 p.m., I served...bat her

bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United S

tigators were still photographing the family. On April EFTA00080512 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-3 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 2 ite. 7/19/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 83 [me: 15:01:37 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Ise NO • 1-05-000368 (Continued) 10, 2006, at approximately 2:30 p.m., I served...bat her

bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United S

tigators were still photographing the family. On April EFTA00089419 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-3 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 2 ite. 7/19/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 83 [me: 15:01:37 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Ise NO • 1-05-000368 (Continued) 10, 2006, at approximately 2:30 p.m., I served...bat her

bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United S