Epstein Secrets

ernment in the case." 27 EFTA00205650 See I3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE

es a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Fla. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not available as a remedy where it is not sought promp

FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE

a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Ha. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not available as a remedy where it is not sought prompt

FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE

a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Ha. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not available as a remedy where it is not sought prompt

n FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See 13A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE

a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Fla. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not available as a remedy where it is not sought promp

rnment in the case." 27 EFTA00208849 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE

a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Ha. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not available as a remedy where it is not sought prompt