Document Mentions (5 shared documents)

EFTA02729080

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

Antonio, Texas Management services • $5,000 SF Brown LTD Co., Santa Fe Contractor/developer • $5,000

e, Ill. Health care • $5,000 Homeland Security Corporation, Nashville, Tenn. Security • $5,000 KBHome, Los Angeles, Calif. Real estate • $5,000 United Mine Workers of America, Price, Utah Labor committee • $5,000 E. W. Williams Jr., Amarillo, Texas Banker 09/12/2019 Page 2260 Agency to Agency Reguet: 19-0

EFTA00175214_sub_001 - EFTA00175214_100

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

nt for past conduct. See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 456-462, 85 S.Ct. 1707, 1719-1722,

ims with no connection to federal law. Economy also weighs in favor of remand as state courts are better equipped to efficiently handle state 2 In United Mine Workers v. Gibbs 383 U.S. 715 (1966), a jury's verdict against a union based on State law claims was reversed, in part, because the federal law claim fail

EFTA00226107_email_074

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

in Shafer. In addition, Defendant has not even alleged that he would be prejudiced by the equita- ble tolling. See Baldwin County Welcome Cir. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152, 104 S.Ct. 1723, 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (discussing prejudice to the defendant as a factor the court must consider when determin

th Plaintiffs federal law claim against Liberatore such that Plaintiff "would ordinarily be expected to try them all in one judicial proceeding." United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 725, 86 S.Ct. 1130, 16 L.Ed.2d 218 (1966). 161 Under Third Circuit jurisprudence, "mere tangential overlap of facts is in