Epstein Secrets

Robertson applied D.C. Circuit law. Morowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 40-41 (2d Cir.I993) (explaining t

mbia, S.A. v. Hall, 466 U.S. 408, 411-12, 416-18, 104 S.Ct. 1868, 80 L.Ed.2d 404 (1984); Borsch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc., 519 F.2d 974, 998 (2c1 Cir.1975) (buying and selling American securities is insufficient to estab- lish that defendant was "doing business" in the United States). Prince Mohamed s

B. Zwany, Arthur P. Hui, Sarah J. Lum, Gary R. Brown, Assistant United States Atter- •7he Honorable Mi

ckler, 717 F.2d 36, 41 (2d Cir.1983), art. denied, — U.S —, 104 S.Ct. 1713, 80 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984); Frontera v Sindell, 522 F.2d 1215, 1219-20 (6th Cir.1975); see also Garcia v. Gloor, 618 F.2d 264, 268 (5th Cir.1980) ("Neither [Title VII] nor com- mon understanding equates national origin with the lan

F.3d 371, 374-75 (11th Cir.1996); United States Brown, 53 F.3d 312, 314-15 (11th Cir.1995). us, Devers

n Act. See, e.g., United States I Boyd, 610 F.2d 521 (8th Cir.197/), cert. denied,444 U.S. 1089 (1980); United States I Harris, 534 F.2d 207 (10th Cir.1975), cert. dented,429 U.S. 941 (1976). Moreover, the trial court questioned pro- spective jurors about their ability to view graphic photographs, some