Epstein Secrets

rivilege. On the contrary, as the court found in Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Wigand No. 101678/

3 257 F.3d 210 (2d Cir. 2001) United States v. Treacv 19 603 F. Supp. 2d 670 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) STATUTES N.Y. Civil Rights Law § 79-h 3 OTHER 9 James Wm. Moore et al.. Moore's Federal Practice (3d ed. 2010) II EFTA00728013 Daily News, L.P. ("Daily News"), and Daily News journalist George Rush resp

rivilege. On the contrary, as the court found in Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Wigand No. 101678/

3 257 F.3d 210 (2d Cir. 2001) United States v. Treacv 19 603 F. Supp. 2d 670 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) STATUTES N.Y. Civil Rights Law § 79-h 3 OTHER 9 James Wm. Moore et al.. Moore's Federal Practice (3d ed. 2010) II EFTA00207336 Daily News, L.P. ("Daily News"), and Daily News journalist George Rush resp

umption In favor of public access to the courts. Brown I. Advantage Engineer- The doctrine of ancillary

to third persons_does not waive—ffe work-pmdiietimmuniV unless it hes sub- stanti eased—the opportunities ir tent ies to obtain the informa- l; 6 James Wm. Moore, et Moore's Federal Practice § 26.70[6][c] (3d ed.2004) at 26-167 ("Because the work product privilege is intended to protect the adversar