Epstein Secrets

pstein) 2 "Decisions by the former Fifth Circuit issued before October 1, 1981, are binding as precedent in the Eleventh Circuit." United States v. Brown, 342 F.3d 1245, 1246 n.1 (11th Cir. 2003). 12 EFTA00304753 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 13 of 25

ld have been addressed in the course of litigation, unless a court has made a specific finding of misconduct by a DOJ attorney . . . ." Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's Mot. File Supp. Auth. DE #82. Accordingly, an order by this Court makin

recedent in the Eleventh Circuit." United States' Brown, 342 F.3d 1245, 1246 n.1 (11th Cir. 2003). 12

ld have been addressed in the course of litigation, unless a court has made a specific finding of misconduct by a DOJ attorney . . . ." Letter from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, May 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit 1 to Victim's Mot. File Supp. Auth. DE #82. Accordingly, an order by this Court makin

by any materials in the record. Accordingly, these assertions of privilege are inadequate. See Bogle. McClure, 332 F.3d 347, 1358 (11th Cir. 2003); Brown' City of Margate, 842 F.Supp. 515, 520 Should the Court allow the Government to assert privilege with regard to any of the materials, the victims w

ith regard to Suppl. Box #3 P-013940 to P-013942. The description there reads: "Draft Letter, marked 'Confidential: To Be Opened by Addressee Only,' Robin C. Ashton to Wifredo A. Ferrer, with handwritten corrections." No date is provided regarding this letter. Nor is there any indication as to whether the lette