Epstein Secrets

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

for the Great Lakes Recovery Center in Marquette, Michigan, which had been in operation for 30 years, left the geographically isolated community in the Upper Peninsula without a reentry center for federal inmates. The federal judges in the affected judicial districts were not consulted, and apparently no provision

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

for the Great Lakes Recovery Center in Marquette, Michigan, which had been in operation for 30 years, left the geographically isolated community in the Upper Peninsula without a reentry center for federal inmates. The federal judges in the affected judicial districts were not consulted, and apparently no provision

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

for the Great Lakes Recovery Center in Marquette, Michigan, which had been in operation for 30 years, left the geographically isolated community in the Upper Peninsula without a reentry center for federal inmates. The federal judges in the affected judicial districts were not consulted, and apparently no provision