Epstein Secrets

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

iving the public and interested organizations, like the Defenders, the opportunity to provide input regarding the duration of community corrections. See Chrysler Corp., 441 U.S. at 316 ("In enacting the APA, Congress made a judgment that notions of fairness and informed administrative decisionmaking require that a

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

iving the public and interested organizations, like the Defenders, the opportunity to provide input regarding the duration of community corrections. See Chrysler Corp., 441 U.S. at 316 ("In enacting the APA, Congress made a judgment that notions of fairness and informed administrative decisionmaking require that a

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

iving the public and interested organizations, like the Defenders, the opportunity to provide input regarding the duration of community corrections. See Chrysler Corp., 441 U.S. at 316 ("In enacting the APA, Congress made a judgment that notions of fairness and informed administrative decisionmaking require that a