Epstein Secrets

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

• PNrrERN's score includes criminal history measures that did not require conviction and thereby may overestimate risk because of faulty data; • PNITERN's score may be higher based on evidence of juvenile offending • PATTERN may increase risk when the individual does not engage in various types of p

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

• PNrrERN's score includes criminal history measures that did not require conviction and thereby may overestimate risk because of faulty data; • PNITERN's score may be higher based on evidence of juvenile offending • PATTERN may increase risk when the individual does not engage in various types of p

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

• PNrrERN's score includes criminal history measures that did not require conviction and thereby may overestimate risk because of faulty data; • PNITERN's score may be higher based on evidence of juvenile offending • PATTERN may increase risk when the individual does not engage in various types of p