Epstein Secrets

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

fails to address a critical question that Congress determined should be addressed by fair and neutral rule-making, not by administrative fiat. 1601 Flab Anne, Room 700, Seattle, Waslalostoa 00101 - Menotti (206) S53-1100 Fax (206) 513-0120 56 of 61 EFTA00100226 Thomas R. Kane November 16, 2011 Page 3

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

fails to address a critical question that Congress determined should be addressed by fair and neutral rule-making, not by administrative fiat. 1601 Flab Anne, Room 700, Seattle, Waslalostoa 00101 - Menotti (206) S53-1100 Fax (206) 513-0120 56 of 61 EFTA00064963 Thomas R. Kane November 16, 2011 Page 3

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

fails to address a critical question that Congress determined should be addressed by fair and neutral rule-making, not by administrative fiat. 1601 Flab Anne, Room 700, Seattle, Waslalostoa 00101 - Menotti (206) S53-1100 Fax (206) 513-0120 56 of 61 EFTA00094081 Thomas R. Kane November 16, 2011 Page 3