Epstein Secrets

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

TACHMENT A EFTA00100224 FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER Western District of Washington Thomas H'. Hither H Federal Public. De/end , November 16, 2011 Thomas R. Kane Acting Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons do Rules Unit Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons 320 First Street, NW Washington, DC 20534

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

TACHMENT A EFTA00064961 FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER Western District of Washington Thomas H'. Hither H Federal Public. De/end , November 16, 2011 Thomas R. Kane Acting Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons do Rules Unit Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons 320 First Street, NW Washington, DC 20534

hority, but also by the procedural requirements which `assure fairness and mature consideration of rules of general application."' Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 303 (1979) (citations omitted). The Second Chance Act explicitly refers to the need for reentry policies to be empirically based. 4

TACHMENT A EFTA00094079 FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER Western District of Washington Thomas H'. Hither H Federal Public. De/end , November 16, 2011 Thomas R. Kane Acting Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons do Rules Unit Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons 320 First Street, NW Washington, DC 20534