Epstein Secrets

s broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th C

Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, M. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami. FL 33160 Fax: Counsel for Plaintiffs In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119, 08- 80232, 08-803

ated self-blame is well-documented (Finkelhor and Brown, 1985). Stigmatization, as experienced by a sexu

ncisco, California, CA. Physicians License G55912, declare the following under penalty of perjury: 2. 1 have been retained by plaintiffs' law firm, Mermelstein & Horowitz, to give expert testimony. If called as a witness, 1 would testify truthfully and competently concerning my psychiatric findings about each of the

See supra p. 33. FN 10. See supra n. 2. FN I 1. Defendant's reliance on United States v. Brown, 801 F.2d 352 (8th Cir.1986), is misplaced. In Brown, the Eighth Circuit determined that the defend- ant had breached a cooperation agree- ment, thus permitting the government to prosecute him for the

Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami FL 3 160 Fax: ssmasexabuseattomev.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08