Epstein Secrets

n r -C) 2' 1"" tea rn PI 0 - n r O - -c BROWN MAY 162001 0 3 —c Ce? cn cn EFTA00229662

had proceeded on the federal charges, 18 U.S.C. § 2255. Epstein's counsel asked to meet with the U.S. Attorney (Alexander Acosta) and the Chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section at the Department of Justice. After that meeting, Epstein's counsel was again informed that we intended to proceed. At that point, Epstein's counse

ilable to vindicate a federal right); Bruschi v. Brown, 876 F.2d 1526, 1531 (11th Cir. 1989) (taking "s

torney R. Alexander Acosta met with some of Epstein's defense team, along with the federal prosecutors assigned to Epstein's case and the Chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Department of Justice's Criminal Division in Washington, D.C. Epstein's defense team again raised federalism-based arguments that were reje

by any materials in the record. Accordingly, these assertions of privilege are inadequate. See Bogle. McClure, 332 F.3d 347, 1358 (11th Cir. 2003); Brown' City of Margate, 842 F.Supp. 515, 520 Should the Court allow the Government to assert privilege with regard to any of the materials, the victims w

, the Office of the Attorney General, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Divisions, the Office of Professional Responsibility, the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, the U.S. Attorney's Offices for the Southern District and Middle District of Florida, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation) and other federal g