Epstein Secrets

2422(b); 2451(a) & (b) Not Consummated Sting Found guilty of attempt at bench trial and sentenced to 180 months & 3 year supervision. U.S. I Brown, 126 Fed. Appx. 448 (10`h Cir. 2005) Internet Internet chat room communications with "13 yr-old"; arranged to meet for sexual encounter; arreste

rwhelmingly confirm the limits to prosecution we have previously identified.2 I For several months, we have also been consulting on this matter with Stephanie Thacker, former Principal Deputy Chief, Department of Justice, Child Exploitation & Obscenity Section. Ms. Thacker supports our position without reservatio

consulting on this matter with Stephanie Thacker, former Principal Deputy Chief, Department of Justice, Child Exploitation & Obscenity Section. Ms. Thacker supports our position without reservation that this is not a matter upon which the federal statues should be brought to bear. Ms. Thacker would als

Found guilty of attempt at bench trial and sentenced to 180 months & 3 year supervision. 2422(b); 2451(a) & (b) Not Consummated Sting U.S. v. Brown, 126 Fed. Appx. 448 (10th Cir. 2005) Internet Internet chat room communications with "13 yr-old"; arranged to meet for sexual encounter; arreste

consulting on this matter with Stephanie Thacker, former Principal Deputy Chief, Department of Justice, Child Exploitation & Obscenity Section. Ms. Thacker supports our position without reservation that this is not a matter upon which the federal statues should be brought to bear. Ms. Thacker would als

verwhelmingly confirm the limits to prosecution we have previously identified.2 For several months, we have also been consulting on this matter with Stephanie Thacker, former Principal Deputy Chief, Department of Justice, Child Exploitation & Obscenity Section. Ms. Thacker supports our position without reservatio

24 F.3d 65, 76-77 (1" Cir. 2005); United States' Brown, 43 F.3d 618, 625 (11`h Cir. 1995). The governmen

e in the West Palm Beach Division of the Southern District of Florida, for making misrepresentations during a prior sentencing proceeding. In fact, Stephanie Thacker, a former deputy to CEOS Chief Drew Oosterbaan, has stated that she knew of no other case like this being prosecuted by CEOS. 3 08-80736-CV-MARRA

of an opportunity to engage in prohibited conduct. See, e.g,. United States v. Sanchez-Berrios, 424 F.3d 65, 76-77 (1" Cir. 2005); United States v. Brown, 43 F.3d 618, 625 (I1th Cu. 1995). The government cannot fairly, or consistent with the rule of lenity, advocate a broader definition of the same te

bmissions include: a summary of the irregularities and misconduct that occurred during the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mr. E stein's case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Atto

ts demonstrate that the opposite is true. First. the evidence shows that the many of the masseuses wet...at:en or over. including inhaling Sjoberg,. Julie Brabon, Vencro. M. and Christine I=. at the time they visited Mr. ISpstein's home. Also, there is substantial evidence. found in the sworn statements o

g coordination with state authorities had been Followed, Mx. Illatbna gave no response other than stating. "il is none of your concern." 7 In thin. Stephanie Thacker. a former deputy to Drew Osterbolom has muted that she knew urno other case like this being prosecuted by ('L'OS. With that in mind. we welcome the