Epstein Secrets

> wrote: On Thu, Oct I, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Cecile de Jongh > wrote: Another thought: it might be good to have Karyna call as well. I'm not sure if Richardson has ever spoken to her. I will continue to call too. With warm regards, Cecile Sent from my iPhone and misspellings courtesy of iPhone. On Oct 1

ile de Jongh < > wrote: I tried Richardson again this afternoon since I did not get a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely sure that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder the cause at this point in the process. I would prefer that we wait to get confirmation that there is absolute

From: Cecile de Jongh To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 01:41:33 +0000 I tried Richardson again this afternoon since I did not get a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely sure that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder

Oct 2015 01:41:33 +0000 I tried Richardson again this afternoon since I did not get a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely sure that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder the cause at this point in the process. I would prefer that we wait to get confirmation that there is absolute

d twice before that the applicaiton was complete. can you send me her number. ? On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Cecile de Jongh < wrote: I tried Richardson again this afternoon since I did not get a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely sure that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder

ecile de Jongh < wrote: I tried Richardson again this afternoon since I did not get a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely sure that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder the cause at this point in the process. I would prefer that we wait to get confirmation that there is absolute

From: Cecile de Jongh < Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 1:42 AM To: jeffrey E. Subject: Re: I tried Richardson again this afternoo= since I did not get a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely su=e that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder

effrey E. Subject: Re: I tried Richardson again this afternoo= since I did not get a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely su=e that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder the cause at this=point in the process. I would prefer that we wait to get confirmation=that there is absolute

eMailSignature"> =/div> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Cecile de Jongh <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: I tried Richardson again this afternoon since I did not g=t a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely sure that having Rand= involved will help rather than hinder

and I will call Donald as well. Please note that the board membe=s are not Gov't employees. With that said, i='s obviously your decision re calling Randy. With warm regard=, Cecile Sent from=my iPhone and misspellings courtesy of iPhone. On Sep 3=, 2015, at 8:36 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]

, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:50 AM Subject: Re: To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Another thought: it might be good to have call as well. I'm not sure if Richardson has ever spoken to her. I will continue to call too. With warm regards, Cecile Sent from my iPhone and misspellings courtesy of iPhone. On Oct 1

ecile de Jongh < wrote: I tried Richardson again this afternoon since I did not get a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely sure that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder the cause at this point in the process. I would prefer that we wait to get confirmation that there is absolute

ook at it on oct 30 On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Cecile de Jongh wrote: Another thought: it might be good to have call as well. I'm not sure if Richardson has ever spoken to her. I will continue to call too. With warm regards, Cecile Sent from my iPhone and misspellings courtesy of iPhone. On Oct 1

Cecile de Jongh < wrote: I tried Richardson again this afternoon since I did not get a return call but no answer. • not entirely sure that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder the cause at this point in the process. I would prefer that we wait to get confirmation that there is absolute

n oct 30 On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Cecile de Jongh < > wrote: Another thought: it might be good to have Karyna call as well. I'm not sure if Richardson has ever spoken to her. I will continue to call too. With warm regards, Cecile Sent from my iPhone and misspellings courtesy of iPhone. On Oct 1

Cecile de Jongh < wrote: I tried Richardson again this afternoon since I did not get a return call but no answer. Pm not entirely sure that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder the cause at this point in the process. I would prefer that we wait to get confirmation that there is absolute

Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Cecile de Jongh <=a href="mailto wrote: Another thought: it might be good to have Karyna call =s well. I'm not sure if Richardson has ever spoken to her. =1 will continue to call too. With warm regards, =span>Cecile Sent from my iPhone and misspe=lings courtesy of iPhone. O

Cecile de Jongh wrote: I tried Richardson again this afternoon since I did not get a ret=rn call but no answer. I'm not entirely sure that having Randy i=volved will help rather than hinder the cause at this point in the process= I would prefer that we wait to get confirmation that there is absol=te

old twice before that the applicaiton was complete. c=n you send me her number. ? On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Cecile de Jongh wrote: I tried Richardson again this afternoon sinc= I did not get a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely sur= that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder

Cecile de Jongh wrote: I tried Richardson again this afternoon sinc= I did not get a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely sur= that having Randy involved will help rather than hinder the cause at this=point in the process. I would prefer that we wait to get confirmatio= that there is absolute