Epstein Secrets

us B. Lau, White & Case LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Stolt—Nielsen S.A. and Stott- Nielsen Transportation Group Ltd. Roberta D. Liebenberg, Allen D. Black, (Argued), Gerard A. Dever, Fine, Kaplan & Black, Philadelphia, PA, James A. Back- strom, Jr., Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee Richard B. Wingfield

ation Group Ltd. Roberta D. Liebenberg, Allen D. Black, (Argued), Gerard A. Dever, Fine, Kaplan & Blac

ict Court's determina- tion whether a cooperation agreement has been breached is a legal conclusion. Unit- ed States v. Baird, 218 F2d 221, 229 (3d Cir.2000). MI findings of fact are re- viewed for clear error. See Bell, 414 F.Sd at 478 (reviewing findings of fact related to a permanent injunction for c

hout prompting or suggestion; on its own motion." Black's Law Dictionary 1437 (7th ed.1999). Thus, the d

e,. Aware Woman Ctr. for Choice, Inc., 253 F.3d 678, 685-87 (11th Cir.2001); Does I thnt XXIII Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1068-69 (9th Cir.2000); James , Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238-39 (4th Cir.1993); EWI. New York Blood Center, 213 F.R.D. 108, 110-12 (E.D.N.Y.2003); Javier I Garcia-Botello, 2

hout prompting or suggestion; on its own motion." Black's Law Dictionary 1437 (7th ed.1999). Thus, the d

v. Aware Woman Cm for Choice, Inc., 253 F.3d 678, 685-87 (11th Cir.2001); Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1068-69 (9th Cir.2000); James v. Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238-39 (4th Cir.I 993); Ill v. New York Blood Center, 213 F.R.D. 108, 110-12 (E.D.N.Y.2003); Javier v. Garcia-Botel

their opposition to the intervention of attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz that Mr. Epstein "is th

eral law to re- solve work product claims and state law to relive attorney-client claims."); Baker . Gen. Motors Corp., 209 F.3d 1051, 53 (8th Cir.2000) (federal courts apply state law to resolve attorney client pnvilege issues and federal law to re- solve work product issues, diversity cases); F