Epstein Secrets

NITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee ROY BLACK ET AL., Intervenor/Appellants INTERVENORS' RESP

t violate the CVRA , its overall litigation position — including urging the Jane Does to advocate for Epstein's prosecution in other districts, see United States Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Doc. 205-2 at 8-9, eloquently demonstrates that there is only the most ephemeral and illusory c

NITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee ROY BLACK ET AL., Intervenor/Appellants INTERVENORS' RESP

t violate the CVRA , its overall litigation position — including urging the Jane Does to advocate for Epstein's prosecution in other districts, see United States Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Doc. 205-2 at 8-9, eloquently demonstrates that there is only the most ephemeral and illusory c

his criminal defense attorneys — appellants Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz — filed motio

t violate the CVRA , its overall litigation position — including urging the Jane Does to advocate for Epstein's prosecution in other districts, see United States Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Doc. 205-2 at 8-9, eloquently demonstrates that there is only the most ephemeral and illusory c