Epstein Secrets

was served on May 16, 2014, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. ESE Jay P. Leflcowitz Kirkland & Ellis, LLP Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Eps

on. DE 188 at 9-10 (emphasis added). Accordingly, the issue has already been settled once — and the Court should not revisit it. See United States Stinson, 97 F.3d 466, 469 (11th Cir.1996) (discussing law of the case doctrine); see also Singh' Washington Univ., 383 F.Supp.2d 99, 101 (D.D.C. 2009) (in

r loss (1) investment Hddng return (5) period BLACK ROCK STRATEGIC INCOME! Symbol' BSI& Trade date:

yes rites under the Wanes Mew Protean Act (SPA) • el the hewn nekton on the top eh ce the Inn of the laimml it not ICS FitIntolSeonark 185 natal Stinson) yea avant as nine broker by d ralgernent *nth the ante oaten We Jawed you on thrsrentionthp nhen you opened his excite In this cat, we keds and

t the FBI Special Agent in Charge called him “to offer congratulations” and “to praise our prosecutors for holding firm against the likes of Messrs. Black, 176 Plea Hearing Transcript at 20, 42. OPR was unable to determine to which victims Belohlavek

d to establish that government lacked probable cause to believe the defendant’s wife had committed a crime at the time it threatened to charge her); Stinson v. State, 839 So. 2d 906, 909 (Fla. App. 2003) (“In cases involving . . . a promise not to prosecute a third party, the government must act in good