Epstein Secrets

h, Epstein violated Florida State Statute, 837.02 Perjury in official proceeding, therefore committing a felony. COUNT #8 Do you know a man named Jean Luc Brunel? EPSTEIN: Can you spell it? He was at your house last week, does that remind you? a l Form, move to strike, culation, argumentative, harassing.

MR. Yes. Do you know him? EPSTEIN: Can you spell his name for me, please? I don't need to spell his name. Do you know who I'm talking about, Mr. Brunel? EPSTEIN: Sony, Mr. what? EFTA01695647 B-r-u-n-e-1. EPSTEIN: I would like to answer that question as well, but my attorneys have counseled me t

felony. COUNT #8 Do you know a man named Jean Luc Brunel? EPSTEIN: Can you spell it? He was at your hous

Deposition if a civil matter where he is a defendant. Prior to the onset of the deposition, Epstein was seated in an office along with Attorney's Steven Jaffe and Court Reporter i=ii=i Jeffrey Epstein, engaged the attorney's in an unsolicited conversation where he stated "I like your other two, I don't l

rine W. Ezell Bradley J. Edwards Deposition of Bill Riley Joint-privilege 03943-03945 09/18/2009 Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhnel Joint-privilege 02911-02912 09/15/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Jack P. Hill Igor Zinoview depo Joint-privilege 02939 07/14/2009 Bradley J. Ed

n Katherine Ezell RE:Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhnel Joint W/P Priv. 15501.15555 09/18/2009 Jacquie

vilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03015 04/24/2009 Steven Jaffe Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissi

n Katherine Ezell RE:Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhnel Joint W/P Priv. 15501.15555 09/18/2009 Jacquie

vilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03015 04/24/2009 Steven Jaffe Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissi

calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03672-03673 06/26/2009 Wayne Black Bradley Edwards Brunel information Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible eviden

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 27155-27159 10/23/2009 Attorneys at RRA Steven Jaffe PACER entries Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evi

calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03672-03673 06/26/2009 Wayne Black Bradley Edwards Brunel information Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible eviden

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 27155-27159 10/23/2009 Attorneys at RRA Steven Jaffe PACER entries Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evi