Epstein Secrets

FROM AMENDED ORDER ID.E. 1068t AND TO COMPEL JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO PAY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ALL DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO HIS REOUEST Movants, LM and Bradley J. Edwards, move this Court for relief from Amended Order [D.E. 1068] related to the production of documents requested by Jeffrey Epstein and to Compel Jeffre

in and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of all Documents which he has requested, and in support thereof, states as follows: 1. Brad Edwards, an attorney employed by Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. ("Farmer Jaffe Weissing"), has represented LM and other women who

all Documents which he has requested, and in support thereof, states as follows: 1. Brad Edwards, an attorney employed by Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. ("Farmer Jaffe Weissing"), has represented LM and other women who allege that they were sexually exploited, sexually abused

s. 2. Epstein filed a frivolous lawsuit against Attorney Edwards and his client LM, who is one of Epstein's forme

f Ira Sochet do Phil Hudson, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: [email protected] (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: [email protected] (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

inor females, including 3. In about April 2008, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., was a licensed attorney in Florida, practicing

RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 RESPONSE OF= BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. AND FARMER. JAFFE. WEISSING, EDWARDS. FISTOS & LEHRMAN. P.L TO CREDITORS MOTION TO CLARIFY PRIOR ORDERS (a minor victim of sex offenses), Bradley J. Edwards, and Fanner, Jaffe, Weissin

ral statute providing for compensation to victims of child sexual abuse, 18 U.S.C. § 2255. 7. On September 11, 2008, at the request of his client Brad Edwards filed a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault on Around the same time, he also filed suits for 8. At abou

ile they were minor girls. 4. On June 13, 2008, attorney Edwards agreed to represent on July 2, 2008, attorney E

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Steven J. Solomon, Esq. Gray Robinson, P.A. 20 EFTA00708312 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603 Filed 04/08/11 Page 21 of 23 Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Michael I. Goldberg, Esq. Las Olas Centre - Suite 1600 (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) LMB Funding G

hearing before December 28, 2010 and moves to briefly stay enforcement of its Order [DE 1068] compelling LM and her counsel Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, & Lehrman, P.L. ("FJW") to produce a privilege log in order to permit the state court: (1) to first rule on the pending motions for summar

of his alleged victims, ■ as well as attorney, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.', in Florida state court for conduct that allege

ble Intervivos Trust of Ira Sochet do Phil Hudson, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Michael I. Goldberg, Esq.

ow who the 19 source of any of that information is. This is yet another 20 piece of information that has appeared, I'm presuming through 21 Mr. Edwards getting it somehow, you know, in relation to some 22 other case and then it appears in discovery in this case. And 23 what it looks like is, you

we have no 9 control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring 10 them to cooperate in any sense. 11 I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. 12 Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last 13 night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is 14 Mr.

, I don't know who the source of any of that information is. This is yet another piece of information that has appeared, I'm presuming through Mr. Edwards getting it somehow, you know, in relation to some other case and then it appears in discovery in this case. And what it looks like is, you know, a

itions, but we have no control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring them to cooperate in any sense. I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is Mr. Edwards' for

y, I don't know who the source of any of that information is. This is yet another piece of information that has appeared, I'm presuming through Mr. Edwards getting it somehow, you know, in relation to some other case and then it appears in discovery in this case. And what it looks like is, you know, a

ositions, but we have no control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring them to cooperate in any sense. I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is Mr. Edwards' for

y kind of evidence against Prof. Dershowitz. See, Coquina Investments, 760 F.3d at 1310 (11th Cir. 2014). Conclusion I

y Epstein (Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards, lawsuit (Case no. 502009-CA- 040800)) in Palm Bea