Epstein Secrets

tem 18 then is defamation litigation. And your Honor is aware that there was a separate lawsuit that's spun out of this situation where Cassell and Edwards filed a defamation action in Florida State Court against Alan Dershowitz. Alan. Dershowitz then counterclaimed. That was litigated in Florida Stat

forth because we think it's irrelevant. But if there was to be some kind of an attack launched on any of the members of the Boies Schiller Firm, of Brad Edwards, myself, we would ask that we be given leave to address that at sidebar, in-camera, or outside the presence of the jury SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS

handling that. 5 This is essentially a hearsay exercise. We want information to 6 be excluded regarding Rebecca Boylan. Why? Because Rebecca 7 Boylan has not been deposed and is not going to be a witness in 8 the case. 9 As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, 10 she's planning

tem 18 then is defamation litigation. And your Honor is aware that there was a separate lawsuit that's spun out of this situation where Cassell and Edwards filed a defamation action in Florida State Court against Alan Dershowitz. Alan Dershowitz then counterclaimed. That was litigated in Florida State

forth because we think it's irrelevant. But if there was to be some kind of an attack launched on any of the members of the Boies Schiller Firm, of Brad Edwards, myself, we would ask that we be given leave to address that at sidebar, in-camera, or outside the presence of the jury SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS

tness in the case. As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, she's planning to call Mr. Dershowitz. Mr. Dershowitz is going to say Ms. Boylan told him that Ms. Giuffre told him something, and so we have the classic hearsay within a hearsay situation. The problem, of course, is that Boylan

hen is defamation litigation. And your Honor 10 is aware that there was a separate lawsuit that's spun out of 11 this situation where Cassell and Edwards filed a defamation 12 action in Florida State Court against Alan Dershowitz. Alan 13 Dershowitz then counterclaimed. That was litigated in Florid

handling that. 5 This is essentially a hearsay exercise. We want information to 6 be excluded regarding Rebecca Boylan. Why? Because Rebecca 7 Boylan has not been deposed and is not going to be a witness in 8 the case. 9 As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, 10 she's planning

g is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 19)... eee 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with Rebecca Boylan is admissible (Motion 1n Limine 20)... ceececesessseeseeceeeeseeneeceseeseeneeeeeerseeeaees 31 C. Plaintiff's Remaining Motions In Limine Are Prematu

et BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP Salt Lake City, UT 84112 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 P| Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 J. Stanley Pottinger Bradley J. Edwards 49 Twin Lakes Rd. FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, — South Salem, NY 10590 FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Po 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. — FL 33301

nt and admissible (Motion in Limine 19).................00. 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with Rebecca Boylan is admissible (Motion in Limine 20)... ccccccccccceceeceeeceseeesecneesseesteeesaeenes 31 C. Plaintiff's Remaining Motions In Limine Are Premature an

th Schultz BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] [email protected] Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] Paul G. C