Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
onday, October 20, 2008 4:48 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Draft Response Letter to Edwards' October 9, 2008 letter Hi Dexter — I am following up on my e-mail from Saturday night. The only concern I have is with the third sentence in your
S); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response Letter to Edwards' October 9, 2008 letter Marie, Attached please find a draft response letter to Brad Edwards' October 9, 2008 letter to me. I was tempted to also include a response to his October 15, 2008 letter to me, which he filed with the court, which I
to also include a response to his October 15, 2008 letter to me, which he filed with the court, which I have yet to SOD EFTA00190723 receive in the U.S. Mail. However, which version of 18 U.S.C. 2255 applies ($50,000 vs. $150,000) seems to be a question of retroactivity of the amendment. This is a civil
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, October 18, 2008 1:29 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response Letter to Edwards' October 9, 2008 letter Marie, Attached please find a draft response letter to Brad Edwards October 9, 2008 letter to me. I was tempted to also in
S); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response Letter to Edwards' October 9, 2008 letter Marie, Attached please find a draft response letter to Brad Edwards October 9, 2008 letter to me. I was tempted to also include a response to his October 15, 2008 letter to me, which he filed with the court, which I
to me. I was tempted to also include a response to his October 15, 2008 letter to me, which he filed with the court, which I have yet to receive in the U.S. Mail. However, which version of 18 U.S.C. 2255 applies ($50,000 vs. $150,000) seems to be a question of retroactivity of the amendment. This is a civil
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
onday, October 20, 2008 5:02 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Draft Response Letter to Edwards' October 9, 2008 letter Ili Dexter — We sent out two sets of victim notifications to Jane Doc it I, which were sent to Brad Edwards as counsel for
S); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: Draft Response Letter to Edwards' October 9, 2008 letter Marie, Attached please find a draft response letter to Brad Edwards' October 9, 2008 letter to me. I was tempted to also include a response to his October 15, 2008 letter to me, which he filed with the court, which I
to me. I was tempted to also include a response to his October 15, 2008 letter to me, which he filed with the court, which I have yet to receive in the U.S. Mail. However, which version of 18 U.S.C. 2255 applies ($50,000 vs. $150,000) seems to be a question of retroactivity of the amendment. This is a civil r
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (7)
Entities connected to both Bradley Edwards and the U.S. Mail
