Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00193199_email_458_sub_001 - EFTA00193199_676

6 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

spiracy created and run by Scott Rothstein has been exposed. On Monday, Mr. Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein, his partner Brad Edwards, and others with tortuous and fraudulent abuses of process that resulted in serious injury to Mr. Epstein. A copy of the Complaint is enclosed with

Rothstein crimes, is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees. As a lawsuit brought by some of the investors' claims, Rothstein and his partner Edwards used Jeffrey Epstein as bait. The litigation strategy, media pronouncements, and investigatory initiatives of Rothstein and Edwards were calculated

of RRA. 5. Defendant, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant he

STEIN, (hereinafter 'EPST.EIN"), by and through. tie Utideraigned attorneys, files this. action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, IndiVidually, BRADLEY-J. EDWARDS, Individually, and L.M., individually. ACC0rdingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyerS and emplOyee

hrough various criminal activities, including mail fraud, wire fraud and money laundering, the United States of America asserts that EFTA00193781 Epstein I. RRA, et al. Page 6 11. Based on media reports, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) press conferences and releases and the Information the massive Po

EFTA00223265_sub_001 - EFTA00223265_100

5 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

FLORIDA &WHEYSett* Plaintiff; v. Complex Litigation, Fla: k cht Pro. 1201 CASE NO. pn 50 2009CAO' -1Oe)"4B SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indliricluallYt BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, and L;,M;,. Individually, Defendants. COPY RECEIVED FOR FPLING DEC Ti itgag orfArt6N M. POCK COMPLAINT 0Ingfil% ciPMPTROIVIR

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

HSTEIN's law firm (RRA) generated revenue of $8 million in one recent year, yet his 70-lawyer law firm had a payroll of $18 million, EFTA00223277 Epstein I. RRA, et al. Page 11 prosecutors said. ROTHSTEIN, who owned half of RRA used investors' money from his Ponzi scheme to make up the shortfall, they said

EFTA00190026

4 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. I Plaintiff, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., Individually, Defendants. 50 2009 UV 0 3 MCCUE COMPLAINT COPY RECEIVED FOR FILING DEC Q t 2QP enAriory n. POCK CLAR

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

eme. e) After EDWARDS was recruited and joined RRA in the spring of 2009, the tone and tenor of rhetoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attomey EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing the court on various motions from being substantive on the facts pled to ridiculously inflammatory a

of L.M. alleging that EPSTEIN forced the minor into "oral sex," yet L.M. testified that she never engaged in oral, anal, or vaginal EFTA00190044 Epstein I. RRA. et al. Page 20 intercourse with EPSTEIN and she had never touched his genitalia. k) Told investors, as reported in an Associated Press article,