Epstein Secrets

RVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. Bradley James Edwards Isidro Manuel Garcia Jack Patrick Hill Katherine Warthen Ezell Michael James Pike Paul G. Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsberg

The Palm Beach Post's (the "Post") Motion to Intervene and Petition for Access to certain court records in this case. It is our understanding that Bradley Edwards and William Berger ofa in Rosenfeldt Adler have filed a similar motion on behalf of a non-party known " and that S motion is set for hearing on J

ger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. Bradley James Edwards Isidro Manuel Garcia Jack Patrick Hill Katheri

MBER: FROM: DATE: FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Esq. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq. June 4, 2009 RE: S

v. Aware Woman Cm for Choice, Inc., 253 F.3d 678, 685-87 (11th Cir.2001); Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1068-69 (9th Cir.2000); James v. Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238-39 (4th Cir.I 993); Ill v. New York Blood Center, 213 F.R.D. 108, 110-12 (E.D.N.Y.2003); Javier v. Garcia-Botel

tates District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Bradley James Edwards [email protected] Isidro Manuel Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell@podhur

ritton, Esq. [email protected] Bradley James Edwards [email protected] Isidro Manuel Garcia isid

e,. Aware Woman Ctr. for Choice, Inc., 253 F.3d 678, 685-87 (11th Cir.2001); Does I thnt XXIII Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1068-69 (9th Cir.2000); James , Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238-39 (4th Cir.1993); EWI. New York Blood Center, 213 F.R.D. 108, 110-12 (E.D.N.Y.2003); Javier I Garcia-Botello, 2

onstitutional basis for precluding trial of criminal case by injunction. Melvin L. Klafter, Leonard R. Harten- feld, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Edward,. Hanrahan, U. S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, Thomas W. James, Asst. U. S. Attys., Chicago, Ill., William W. Goodrich, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Joanne

ict Court's determina- tion whether a cooperation agreement has been breached is a legal conclusion. Unit- ed States v. Baird, 218 F2d 221, 229 (3d Cir.2000). MI findings of fact are re- viewed for clear error. See Bell, 414 F.Sd at 478 (reviewing findings of fact related to a permanent injunction for c