3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
9 / 3
Mentions
roward Blvd., Ste. 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL
is case arises from Plainfiffitounter-Defendant Jeffery Epstein's lawsuit against Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Bradley Edwards and Scott Rothstein. Edwards then countersued Epstein for malicious prosecution. Epstein voluntarily dismissed his initial suit On Augustin 2011, Epstein served an Offer of Jud
ger & 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esquire 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale FL 301 Bradley J. Edwards Esquire Staftefil Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fred ' de I Financial Plaza S
, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Btoward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradle J. Edwards Es . brad Fan a e eissing 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Es . tnancta aza Suite 2612 Fort Lauderda
N, against Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, and are not part of the legal claims brought by Defendant/Counte•-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, against Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. However, this Proposal is intended to resolve all such claims if available.
udgment statute and rule must be strictly construed, as they are in derogation of the common law rule that each party pay its oven attorney's fees. Alamo Fin., v. Mazoff, 112 So. 3d 626, 628 (FM. 4th DCA 2013). "The, rule does not demand the impossible. It merely requires that the settlement proposal be
mla Fyn Jack Goldberger, Esq. Marc Nurik, Esq. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Fred Haddad, Esq. Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. W
is case arises from Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffery Epstein's lawsuit against Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Bradley Edwards and Scott Rothstein. Edwards then countersued Epstein for malicious prosecution. Epstein voluntarily dismissed his initial suit. On August 25, 2011, Epstein served an Offer of
judgment statute and rule must be strictly construed, as they are in derogation of the common law rule that each party pay its own attorney's fees. Alamo Fin., L.P. v. Mazoff, 112 So. 3d 626, 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). "The rule does not demand the impossible. It merely requires that the settlement proposa
a. Esa. Jack Goldberner, Esa. Marc Nurik, Esq. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Fred Haddad, Esq. Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. W
is case arises from Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffery Epstein's lawsuit against Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Bradley Edwards and Scott Rothstein. Edwards then countersued Epstein for malicious prosecution. Epstein voluntarily dismissed his initial suit. On August 25, 2011, Epstein served an Offer of
judgment statute and rule must be strictly construed, as they are in derogation of the common law rule that each party pay its own attorney's fees. Alamo Fin.. L.P. v. Mazoff, 112 So. 3d 626, 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). "The rule does not demand the impossible. It merely requires that the settlement propos
Entities connected to both Bradley Edwards and Alamo Fin

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSONTonja Haddad Coleman
PERSONFred Haddad
PERSONChambers
PERSONBurlington & Rockenbach
ORGANIZATIONMarc Nurik
PERSONFlorida Rule of Civil
ORGANIZATION
William B. King
PERSON
Nichols
PERSONBowman
PERSONthe General Release
ORGANIZATIONZiadie
PERSONMazoff
PERSONthe Court on Counter-Defendant's
ORGANIZATIONthe Offer of Judgment
ORGANIZATIONFarm Mut
PERSONDefendant's Motion for Fees and Costs
ORGANIZATION