Epstein Secrets

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408

) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves this Court for entry of an order directing Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") to respond to questions asked of him at his deposition taken on March 23, 2010, and again on May 15, 2013, and to such follow up questions as are

e objection, same instruction. Id. at page 235; line 20-21. Q: At the meetings that you, at the meetings that occurred where these various lawyers, Berger, Adler, Stone, Rob Buschel were present and Epstein was discussed, was the discovery that, discovery and/or investigation regarding Mr. Epstein was tat ever disc

ry important distinction when Your Honor comes to ruling upon whether these lines of inquiry are relevant at all. Does it make any difference what Bradley Edwards' motive was, what his subjective thought processes were in filing a motion in the context of a pending case to require the posting of a bond if re

otion to overrule objections and compel Defendant/ Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards' answer to questions. Judge, this motion is directed at Mr. Edwards' deposition testimony and the two depositions he provided in this case, the first of which was March 23rd, 2010, the second of which was May 15th,

Mr. Epstein?" "Same objection. Same instruction." Question: "At the meetings that you at the meetings that occurred where these various lawyers, Berger, Adler, Stone, Rob Bushel were present and Epstein was discussed, was the discovery and/or investigation regarding Mr. Epstein ever discussed?" "Objection."

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408

) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves this Court for entry of an order directing Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") to respond to questions asked of him at his deposition taken on March 23, 2010, and again on May 15, 2013, and to such follow up questions as are

e objection, same instruction. Id. at page 235; line 20-21. Q: At the meetings that you, at the meetings that occurred where these various lawyers, Berger, Adler, Stone, Rob Buschel were present and Epstein was discussed, was the discovery that, discovery and/or investigation regarding Mr. Epstein was tat ever disc