Epstein Secrets

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

spiracy created and run by Scott Rothstein has been exposed. On Monday, Mr. Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein, his partner Brad Edwards, and others with tortuous and fraudulent abuses of process that resulted in serious injury to Mr. Epstein. A copy of the Complaint is enclosed with

Rothstein crimes, is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees. As a lawsuit brought by some of the investors' claims, Rothstein and his partner Edwards used Jeffrey Epstein as bait. The litigation strategy, media pronouncements, and investigatory initiatives of Rothstein and Edwards were calculated

of RRA. 5. Defendant, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant he

STEIN, (hereinafter 'EPST.EIN"), by and through. tie Utideraigned attorneys, files this. action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, IndiVidually, BRADLEY-J. EDWARDS, Individually, and L.M., individually. ACC0rdingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyerS and emplOyee

", but were being contacted, subpoenaed or listed to harass and Intimidate them and Epstein, and to add "star" appeal to the marketing effort of the Ponzl scheme. EFTA00193829 Epstelni. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS,

amination by Mr. Lick SS Vs. 7 Redirect Examination by Mr. Scarola 131 SCOTT 0.0TNSTBIN, individually; 0 Rocones-Exaninatien by Mr. Lick 138 BRADLEY EDWARDS, Individually, 9 Further Redirect Examination by Mr. Scarola 160 Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. 10 Certificate of Oath 170 / 11 Certificate

5 5 Berger in the matter of Jeffrey 5 APPEARANCES: 6 For Plaintiff: 4 Epstein versus Scott Rothstein and Bradley 7 LINK 4 ROCKENBACH, . Edwards. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 0 9 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE , This deposition is being hold 2255 Glad

would moan -- for example, 1 when you aay -- it wasn't during the time of the 2 Mr. Scarola's firm represented a client against 2 Rothstein -- Brad Edward➢ wasn't working for the ) Mr. Epstein, right? ) Rothstein firm, I don't believe, when this happened. 4 A Correct. 4 Q When he settled? 5 Q

n't have any further 15 A Yes. 25 questions. 16 Q Right. And I bet it was a shock to you 16 REDIRECT EXAMINATION 13 that ho was running a Ponzl scram, because nowhere 17 BY KR. SCAROLA: IS in your mind would you have thought that was 10 0 Ara there any other sections of this 19 possib

EY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: Defendants. COMPLAINT SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other l

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and Is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

good faith and with the bests interests of their clients In mind at all times when in reality, they were acting in furtherance of the investment or Ponzl scheme described herein. EPSTEIN justifiably relied to his detriment on the representations of RRA, and Defendants, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and as to h

22 pertains to MS Capital, and on and on 23 So, in any event, what we realized is 24 the cue with respect to the Epstein vs. Scott 25 Rothstein, Bradley Edwards case, is this is 6 (Pages 21 10 24 OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, MC. EFTA00235306 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-3 Entered on FLSD

or 5 the interested party, LM, also on behalf of 6 it, whether ifs a special master or whether it's 6 Brad Edwards and I'm sorry, your Honor, Mr. Edwards 7 a contract attorney, if they need to do that, but 7 is here with me. I neglected to Introduce him to S 8 1 don't think wo even need to reach th

z, where I think that we had told her 21 originally we had heard there were, as an 22 example, sonic loan files or transaction files 23 related to Ponzl deals related to Mr. Epstein, 24 because I remember myself even hearing that going 25 back many, many, many months ago. Pitt 31 1 they had been