Epstein Secrets

t with a lawyer." [Exhibit 1]. The source for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards. 2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: EFTA00616236 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG a. "We would be very keen to

ew details about Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew." [Exhibit 2]. 4. Two days later, another British publication, "The Observer," reported: "Edwards' lawyer, Jack Scarola, said last week that his team intended to try and get a statement from the prince [Andrew] about what he may or may not have

s were made against him by as many as 40 girls, of whom 17 have settled civil claims they brought against the billionaire. Epstein is himself suing Brad Edwards, a lawyer for several of the girls. Epstein alleges that Mr Edwards was linked to a fraud committed by a former colleague — a claim dismissed by the

his Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff From Making Extra-Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press, and, as grounds therefor, states: 1. On March 11, 2011, the British publication "The Telegraph" published an article entitled "Convicted paedoph

t with a lawyer." [Exhibit I]. The source for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards. 2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: EFTA00599554 CASE NO, 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMI1 AC; a. "We would be very keen t

Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 and Gary Farmer, Esquire, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, et al., 425 N. Andrews Avenue, 42, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. J eph Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 Christopher E. Knight Fla. Bar.

his Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff From Making Extra-Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press, and, as grounds therefor, states: I. On March 11, 2011, the British publication "The Telegraph" published an article entitled "Convicted paedoph

9:00am (PST)/ 12:00 pm (EST) Los Angeles, CA Edwards' depo of Alfred Seckel We are filing a Motion

uestions and Appear for Further Deposition; n for Protective Order to Preclude Scarola Et from making Extra Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press (Judge Crow) Motions: 1). Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint; 2). Motion for Protective Order and Objections to Canceled Notice of Taking De

otion for Protective Order to Preclude Scarola Et Edwards from making Extra Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press (Judge Crow) Edwards' Motions: 1). Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint; 2). Motion for Protective Order and Objections to Canceled Notice of Taking Deposition and

ear for Further Deposition; 5). Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Scarola Et Edwards from making Extra Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press (Judge Crow) Edwards' Motions: 1). Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint; 2). Motion for Protective Order and Objections to Canceled Notice of