Epstein Secrets

tance that you discussed the contents of the documents with? A I don't recall anybody except my attorneys. Q Did you have any communication with Bradley Edwards regarding the content of those documents? A I don't recall. Q Since receiving those documents, did you have any communication with Bradley Edwar

a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which case? MR. SCAROLA: This is the subpoena duces tecum issued in the

ed from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which case? MR. SCAROLA

.M., E.W., and Jane Doe 10 EFTA00793508 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6488 Filed 10/22/18 Page 11 of 165 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FLBN Brittany N. Henderson FLBN 118247 Edwards Pottinger LLC Attorneys for Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Jack Scarola, Esi= Fl

long as the information is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." Donahay v. Palm Beach Tours & Transp., Inc„ 242 F.R.D. 685, 687 (S.D. Fla. 2007) (internal quotations omitted). The burden is on the party asserting a privilege or other basis for refusing to answer a depos

rding Alan Dershowitz, either by producing the information or compiling a proper privilege log. DATED: July xxx, 2015 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, 9 EFTA00210996 EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale,

xx, 2015 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, 9

e general course of this proceeding. DE 330 at 23 (internal quotation omitted). 8 EFTA00210995 Donahay I. Palm Beach Tours & Transp., Inc,., 242 F.R.D. 685, 687 (S.D. Fla. 2007) (internal quotations omitted). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are broadly written and "strongly favor full discovery w

o Motion to Exceed Presumptive Ten Deposition Limit via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Meridith Schultz Boors, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FiSTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street J. Stanley Pottinger SIM Is/ Nicole Simmons

on behalf of Plaintiff by her attorneys, Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. Menningcr DecL, Ex. A, p. 4. Th

individuals may have discoverable information does not necessarily entitle a party to depose each such individual." Dixon v. Certainteed Corp., 164 F.R.D. 685, 692 (D.Kan.1996). "The factors relevant to determining whether a party should be entitled to more than ten depositions are now set forth in Fed.R.