Epstein Secrets

3 Page 23 of 23 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Fax: (954) 356-0022 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Henderson Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Email: brad@cvlf

fllp.com Email: [email protected] Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Henderson Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Ave.,

on—the method by which the Settlement Fund is distributed to the Class- "must be fair and adequate." Facebook, 343 F. Supp. 3d at 414 (quoting In re WorldCom, Inc. Sec. Litig., 388 F. Supp. 2d 319, 344 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(2). Where, as in this case, a Plan of Allocation is "formul

exner LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 David Boles Boles Schiller & Flexner LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Bradley J. Edwards (Pro Hac Vice) FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Paul G.

FL 33301 David Boles Boles Schiller & Flexner LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Bradley J. Edwards (Pro Hac Vice) FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Paul G. Cassell (Pro Hac Vice) S.J. Quinney College of L

Jenkens & Gilchrist, 362 F. Supp. 2d 407 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) 6 F.D.I.C. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 45 F.3d 969 (5th Cir. 1995) 6 In re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation, 2005 WL 375315 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2005) 17 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1997) passim Rules Fe

ow who the 19 source of any of that information is. This is yet another 20 piece of information that has appeared, I'm presuming through 21 Mr. Edwards getting it somehow, you know, in relation to some 22 other case and then it appears in discovery in this case. And 23 what it looks like is, you

he kind of questions that have 16 been disapproved in the Second Circuit. And that's Brink's 17 Inc. v. City of New York, which is in the papers; WorldCom 18 Security Litigation, also in the papers; and LiButti itself. 19 These are not technical objections. It serves no legitimate 20 evidentiary p

, I don't know who the source of any of that information is. This is yet another piece of information that has appeared, I'm presuming through Mr. Edwards getting it somehow, you know, in relation to some other case and then it appears in discovery in this case. And what it looks like is, you know, a

he kind of questions that have 16 been disapproved in the Second Circuit. And that's Brink's 17 Inc. v. City of New York, which is in the papers; WorldCom 18 Security Litigation, also in the papers; and LiButti itself. 19 These are not technical objections. It serves no legitimate 20 evidentiary p

, as I ng as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the intent of Congress United States X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citing Edward." DeBartolo Corp. Florida GulfCoast Building & Constr. Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568 (1988). At e least, to eliminate questions as to its constitut

ns and legislation have been put into place; and many other business firms--established ones like General Electric and Xerox, newer ones like Tyco, WorldCom, and Global Crossing--have undergone probes or have even dissolved. Mean-while, the tacit or demonstrable complicity of members of boards of directo