Epstein Secrets

t Production Protocol, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument of all counsel present at

Qtask data for purposes of determining the applicability of the attorney/client and work product privileges that may inure to the benefit of L.M., Brad Edwards, and other current or former clients of Fanner, Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) prepare a privilege log in accordanc

l, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument of all counsel present at the hearing, and be

t Production Protocol, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument of all counsel present at

Qtask data for purposes of determining the applicability of the attorney/client and work product privileges that may inure to the benefit of L.M., Brad Edwards, and other current or former clients of Fanner, Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) prepare a privilege log in accordanc

l, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument of all counsel present at the hearing, and be

t Production Protocol, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument of all counsel present at

Qtask data for purposes of determining the applicability of the attorney/client and work product privileges that may inure to the benefit of L.M., Brad Edwards, and other current or former clients of Fanner, Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) prepare a privilege log in accordanc

l, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument of all counsel present at the hearing, and be