Epstein Secrets

ase No. 502009 CA040800XXXXMB AG The Plaintiff Epstein commenced an action on December 7, 2009 seeking damages against Defendants, Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM,' based on an alleged illegal Ponzi scheme by the Defendants, and the Plaintiff believes others as well, to market investments to outside i

ct Law Firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). Some of the lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL ("Farmer Jaffe"). Epstein has alleged and believes that the Defendants and perhaps other former employees of RRA conspired to

wing service list in the manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this 2nd day of September, 2010. Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL -9- Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 'ICA A I ' A F

ssion between the prosecution and defense during attempts to reach a compromise United States v. Davis, 617 F. 2d 677, 683 (DC Cir. 1979), cited in Nunes v State of Florida, 988 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). It would obviously present a chilling effect on any settlement discussions if such discussions could

ase No. 502009 CA040800XXXXMB AG The Plaintiff Epstein commenced an action on December 7, 2009 seeking damages against Defendants, Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM,' based on an alleged illegal Ponzi scheme by the Defendants, and the Plaintiff believes others as well, to market investments to outside i

ct Law Firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). Some of the lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL ("Farmer Jaffe"). Epstein has alleged and believes that the Defendants and perhaps other former employees of RRA conspired to

wing service list in the manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this 2nd day of September, 2010. Brad Edwards, Esq. Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 423 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954.524-2822

ssion between the prosecution and defense during attempts to reach a compromise United States v. Davis, 617 F. 2d 677, 683 (DC Cir. 1979), cited in Nunes v State of Florida, 988 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). It would obviously present a chilling effect on any settlement discussions if such discussions could

ase No. 502009 CA040800XXXXMB AG The Plaintiff Epstein commenced an action on December 7, 2009 seeking damages against Defendants, Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM,' based on an alleged illegal Ponzi scheme by the Defendants, and the Plaintiff believes others as well, to market investments to outside i

ct Law Firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). Some of the lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL ("Farmer Jaffe"). Epstein has alleged and believes that the Defendants and perhaps other former employees of RRA conspired to

wing service list in the manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this 2nd day of September, 2010. Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 423 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 -9- Jack Alan Goldberger,

ssion between the prosecution and defense during attempts to reach a compromise United States v. Davis, 617 F. 2d 677, 683 (DC Cir. 1979), cited in Nunes v State of Florida, 988 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). It would obviously present a chilling effect on any settlement discussions if such discussions could