Epstein Secrets

M MO NM DB NYO NB HF HF HF AF BF HF Fe Fe HF |S ao FBP WN F- 970 DO DN ODO OT BR W NY — ROUGH DRAFT TITLE ***ROUGH DRAFT TRANSCRIPT *** CASE NAME: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ WITNESS NAME: PAUL G. CASSELL DATE OF DEPOSITION: 10/16/15 This is an unedited, unproofread, | uncertif

a common interest privilege with you as counsel in the CVRA case? Had you entered into an agreement with any other attorney? You have co-counsel, Mr. Edwards. MS. McCAWLEY: Well, to the extent that's going to reveal privileged information about accountant interest agreement, I am not going to ROUGH DRAF

question. BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. Who, as your understanding as of December 30th of 2014, with which attorneys did you have a common interest privilege? A. Brad Edwards from, obviously, the law firm that I've been working with here. Also attorneys from the Boies Schiller law firm who were representing Virginia Robert

act what I'm doing, but I was aware, since the issue is, well, what's in the public record, I was aware that, you know, probably the most significant United States Supreme Court case argued in the last 20 years was Bush versus Gore, which was a case that essentially determined who was going to be President of the most powerfu

-Filed 11/23/2015 05:53:31 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. / PLAINTIFFS/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT EDWARDS AND CASSELL’S RESPONSE TO DERSHOWI

ASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. / PLAINTIFFS/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT EDWARDS AND CASSELL’S RESPONSE TO DERSHOWITZ’S MOTION TO DETERMINE CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants Bradley J. Edwards an

ous adult when she flew on that airplane. Q. You were asked on the occasion of that same Don Lemon CNN interview what possible motive the attorneys, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, could have had to have identified you in the pleading that was filed in the Crime Victim's Rights Act case. _ warn nw be wn Bb N

what I'm doing, but I was aware -- since the issue is, well, what's in the public record, I was aware that, you know, probably the most significant United States Supreme Court case argued in the last 20 years was Bush versus Gore, which was a case that essentially determined who was going to be President of the most powerfu

he two Florida offenses. The judge left open what the possible remedy could be.11-391 v. Epstein (2015) In a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims iitis suitiwo) on= (then known as , alleged in a sworn affidavit that at age 17, sh

n a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the C

sinesses and rescinded the individual health insurance mandate penalty of the Affordable Care Act He a_ppoMted_m_federaispellate ,judges and three United States Supreme Court justices. In foreign policy, Trump pursued an America First agenda, withdrawing Donald Trump Official portrait, 2017 45th President of the United

nsion in New York City and on his private Caribbean island, Little Saint James. The suit was settled in 2018 under undisclosed terms.[01][20][162] Bradley Edwards' defamation v. Epstein (2018) A state civil lawsuit in Florida filed by attorney Bradley Edwards against Epstein was scheduled for trial in December

opportunity to make their accusations in public. However, the case was settled on the first day of the trial, with Epstein publicly apologizing to Edwards; other terms of the settlement were confidential.C137M-0.31 v. Epstein and Maxwell (2019) -TINCC-CGO SexCAL 119P0e1) On April 16, 2019, went publ

inesses and rescinded the individual health insurance mandate penalty of the Affordable Care Act. He appointed 54 federal appellate hikes and three United States Supreme Court justices. In foreign policy, Trump pursued an America First agenda, withdrawing Donald Trump Official portrait, 2017 45th President of the United

3401 Marc Nurik Es . Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Fanner Jaffe Weissin Edwards Fistos Lehrman For

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA04080

torney and pursuant to this Court's instruction today, hereby files this Notice of Filing Supplemental Authority. This filing contains the following United States Supreme Court Cases: Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984) and Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479 (1951), which were referenced by undersigned at today's

ts, government IDs, and travel-related details. According to the article, the company said no passwords or credit card numbers were exposed, though Rewards members may have had account IDs and balances compromised, raising concerns EFTA01655457 about targeted phishing attempts. The article noted that

01, Severi), National Review (10/01, Lynch), New York Post (10/01, Nava), Newsweek (10/01, Silverman), Politico (10/01, Pellish), Raw Story (10/01, Edwards), and USA Today (10/01, Bagchi). Back to Top COUNTERTERRORISM Trump's Approach to Drug Boats 'Mirrors War on Terror Tactics' The Independent (10/

Preview of the 2025-2026 Term — Thursday, October 2, 2025. Location: Online event, 12:00 PM. Following a dramatic conclusion to its last term, the United States Supreme Court reconvenes on October 6 for the start of the 2025-2026 term. The Court is poised to address several pivotal issues, including participation of biolo

mim Michael C. Miller May 15, 2017 Brad Edwards, Esq. Re: v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al. Civil Action No. 17-cv-616 Dear Brad: Steptoe stenos • JOHNSON 1.0 In accordance with the Court's May 15,

mim Michael C. Miller May 15, 2017 Brad Edwards, Esq. Re: v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al. Civil Act

meet the heightened pleading standards applicable to fraud based claims, it also fails to meet the more relaxed pleading standards set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Igbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009). These two decisions set forth the basic requi

Michael C. Miller 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York. NY 10036 main www.steploe.com May 2017 Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Jane Doe 43 v. Je

Michael C. Miller 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York. NY 10036 main www.steploe.com May 2017 Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Jane Doe 43 v. Jeffery Epstein, et al. Civil Action No.

meet the heightened pleading standards applicable to fraud based claims, it also fails to meet the more relaxed pleading standards set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Igbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009). These two decisions set forth the basic requi