Epstein Secrets

RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION Date: 10/28/2009 Synopsis: Open and assign a new 72 (Obstruction of Justice) matter. Details: On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date of birth , was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth . Edwards is an attorney who is representing four fema e in ividuals who are

ustice) matter. Details: On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date of birth , was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth . Edwards is an attorney who is representing four fema e in ividuals who are suing Jeffrey Epstein. Rodriguez was an employee for Epstein. Edward's deposed R

GUEZ stated that he forgot that he had these items until the past couple of months. RODRIGUEZ wanted to sell these items for $50,000.00 to attorney BRADLEY EDWARDS because he had been unable to work since losing his job with EPSTEIN. During RODRIGUEZ' employment with EPSTEIN he (RODRIGUEZ) saw naked minor fem

renew every 90 days) Bb. Check box If verbal authority was obtained. 17 Name: Date: 10/28/2009 (M... 7. Chief Division Counsel (CDC)/Office of the General Counsel (OGC) has been contacted, foresees no entrapment, and has advised monitoring, itiai23.apprOplate. _ Name: (MM) (FBI) Date of Contact: 10/28/2009

ld articulate pertinent, timely facts and predication for which the purpose of the consensual monitoring is requested): On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date of birth 11/16/1975, was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth 04/12/1975. Edwards is an attorney who is representing four female indi

uested): On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date of birth 11/16/1975, was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth 04/12/1975. Edwards is an attorney who is representing four female individuals who are suing Jeffrey Epstein. Rodriguez was an employee for Epstein. Edward's deposed Ro

(City, County or Other) A State Will the monitoring occur in the territory of another division? 0 No 7. Chief Division Counsel (CDC)/Office of the General Counsel (OGC) has been contacted, foresees no entrapment, and has advised monitoring is legal & appropriate. 00A Yes O For the duration of investigation

ld articulate pertinent, timely facts and predication for which the purpose of the consensual monitoring is requested): On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date of birth 11/16/1975, was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth 04/12/1954, Edwards is an attorney who is representing four female indi

uested): On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date of birth 11/16/1975, was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth 04/12/1954, Edwards is an attorney who is representing four female individuals who are suing Jeffrey Epstein, A Rodriguez was an employee for Epstein. Edward's deposed

when Will the monitoring occur in the territory of another division? EFTA00108655 (1)(:) A Yes O No 7. Chief Division Counsel (CDC)/Office of the General Counsel (OGC) has been contacted, foresees no entrapment, and has advised monitoring is legal & appropriate. b. Check box if verbal authority was obtained.

articulate pertinent, timely facts and predication for which the. Purpose of the consensual monitoring Is reouested): On or about August of lames Edwards; date of birth was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth Edwards is an attorney who Is representing four female individuals who are suing

ALFREDO-,RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and. phone, calls between. RODRIGUEZ an. FBI UC

ew ever/ 90 days) 6b. Check box if verbal authority was obtained. E Name: --- Date: 10/28/2009 • I 7. Chief Division Counsel (CDC)/Office of the General Counsel (OGC) has been contacted, foresees no entrapment, and has advised monitoring is legal & appropriate. S. Violations Title: 18 u.S.C: 1509 & 1510