Epstein Secrets

STEIN, et al. Defendant. REAL PARTY IN INTEREST BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ.'S RESPONSE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTE

Jane Doe's attorney Bradley J. Edwards, defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit in the 15°' Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida against Edwards alleging that he had fabricated certain sexual assault cases against Epstein. Epstein v. Edwards, Case No. 502009 CA040800XXXXM6 AG. One of the all

nt use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out those objections in the state ma

eking to block the use of certain incriminating correspondence in a separate state proceeding that he himself initiated against Jane Doe's attorney, Bradley J. Edwards. Bradley Edwards filed a response, and the Magistrate Judge denied Epstein's motion. The Magistrate Judge ruled that he "agree[d] with Edwards . . .

y J. Edwards. Bradley Edwards filed a response, and the Magistrate Judge denied Epstein's motion. The Magistrate Judge ruled that he "agree[d] with Edwards . . . that if Defendant believes he has a valid basis for prevent disclosure of the subject documents in the subject state court proceedings, he sh

nt use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out those objections in the state ma

STEIN, et al. Defendant. REAL PARTY IN INTEREST BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ.'S RESPONSE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTE

Jane Doe's attorney Bradley J. Edwards, defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit in the 15°' Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida against Edwards alleging that he had fabricated certain sexual assault cases against Epstein. Epstein v. Edwards, Case No. 502009 CA040800XXXXM6 AG. One of the all

nt use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out those objections in the state ma