Epstein Secrets

AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. cor.50.2929aufactigIVP111, CASE NO. • A Aq SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and .M., individually, Defendants. COMPL CO Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned

ant, ROTHSTEIN and Stuall osenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

at ROTHSTEIN was utilizing RRA as a front for the mass selling an alleged interest or investment in the Ci • Epstein. 27. Further evidencing that EDWARDA possibly other attorneys of RRA) knew or should have known and participated in the continuation of the massive Ponzi scheme, a front-page Palm Beac

S OF NE COR OF LOT 2 ON E/L, W 20.52 ALG F ST RD 84, S 15.72 TO POB, S ov S 7.25, E 12.59, S 24.40, W 29.9 AKA: BAY 1 PORTS1DE l ir (RPI3) 1012 East Broward B ard, as "Defendant and easeme 6 31.74, N 24.00, E 49.07 TO FOB umber of 5042 23 28 0010; rt Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to

RIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800)OOO(MB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. / EPSTEIN'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO EDWARDS Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to H

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. / EPSTEIN'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO EDWARDS Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to Ha. R. Civ. P. 1.370, requests that Defendant, BRADELY J. EDWARDS ("Edwards" and/or "You" and/or "Your") ad

o. 09-CV-81092, in responding to numerous questions which referenced that You only had three pending cases against Epstein. kg 3/23/10 Deposition of Brad Edwards at 12, 26, 59-60, 71, 80, 83-84,124, 301-03. 21. Admit that Scott Rothstein was involved in the decision to file the Complaint EFTA00722579 Epst

West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard EFTA00722581 Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Case No. 50 2009CAO40800XXXXMB AG Epstein's First Request for Admissions to Edwards Page 6

ORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. Motion to Compel Bradley Edwards To Appear For Follow-Up Deposition Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN (

business associates (including well-known public figures) in order to defraud investors and support extortionate demands for payment from Epstein. Edwards, formerly of RRA, represents three (3) of the alleged Jane Does. The misconduct featured the filing of legal motions and the pursuit of a civil liti

Edwards brought from his small private practice ("Brad Edwards P.A.") to RRA, which Rothstein feverishly market

foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this day of , 2010: MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Gary M. Farmer, Jr., Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews

ORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. Motion to Compel Bradley Edwards To Appear For Follow-Up Deposition Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN (

business associates (including well-known public figures) in order to defraud investors and support extortionate demands for payment from Epstein. Edwards, formerly of RRA, represents three (3) of the alleged Jane Does. The misconduct featured the filing of legal motions and the pursuit of a civil liti

Edwards brought from his small private practice ("Brad Edwards P.A.") to RRA, which Rothstein feverishly market

foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this day of , 2010: MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Gary M. Farmer, Jr., Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually, EDWARDS, L.M., E.W., Intervenors. ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762 APPENDIX TO RESPONSE TO PETI

derdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. EDWARDS POTT1NGER LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, St

, 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Falm Beach, FL 33401 , this day of February, 2010. LAW OFFICES OF MARC S. Counsel to Scott Rothstein One East Broward Boule Fort Lauderdale, FL 3 . NURIK a Bar No. 272817 3 te 700 A36 EFTA00798202

behalf of Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L., by SETH LEHRMAN, ESQUIRE on behalf of LM, Mr. Edwards, and Farmer Jaffee Weissing. OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, INC. (305) 358-8875 . . EFTA_R 1_00015984 EFTA01735152 Page 3 1 2 3 4

before the HONORABLE RAYMOND B. RAY, one of the Judges of the United States Bankruptcy Court, in and for the Southern District of Florida, at 299 East Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida on Monday, April 11, 2011, commencing at or about 9:30 a.m., and the following proceedings wer