Epstein Secrets

166, 2006 WL 2882580, *11 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2006). ... The '° Rather than list his client's address in the custody of the U.S. Marshal's Office, Mr. Edwards said her address is "do" himself. 19 EFTA00605133 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 228 Filed 06/20/16 Page 23 of 29 requirement that prior notic

e City, UT 84112 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 [email protected] Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] [email protected] Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] J. Stanley P

) 19 Grochowski v. Phoenix Const., 318 F.3d 80, 86 (2d Cir.2003). 5 lantosca v. Benistar Admin. Svcs., Inc., 765 F.Supp.2d 79 (D. Mass. 2011) 6 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110, 121 (2d Cir. 1997) 16 Murphy v. Board of Educ., 196 F.R.D. 220, 222 (W.D.N.Y.2000) 19 Perfect Pearl Co., Inc. v

exner LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 David Boles Boles Schiller & Flexner LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Bradley J. Edwards (Pro Hac Vice) FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Paul G.

FL 33301 David Boles Boles Schiller & Flexner LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Bradley J. Edwards (Pro Hac Vice) FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Paul G. Cassell (Pro Hac Vice) S.J. Quinney College of L

Deposit Co. of Maryland, 45 F.3d 969 (5th Cir. 1995) 6 In re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation, 2005 WL 375315 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2005) 17 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1997) passim Rules Fed. R. Evid. 611(c) 16 ii EFTA00622177 Plaintiff respectfully submits her repl

confidante. She is a self-described advocate. In many instances throughout this ordeal, Ms. Churcher was acting as a source of information to Mr. Edwards, who is another lawyer who has entered an appearance in this case, and to law enforcement. The Shield Law only applies when journalists are asked

t would not justify a deposition, which leaves really the Fifth Amendment implications that have been represented will be made, and that raises the LiButti issue. And under LiButti, your Honor, really the permeating factor is control. And the typical case -- really, most of the cases, to the extent co

ow who the 19 source of any of that information is. This is yet another 20 piece of information that has appeared, I'm presuming through 21 Mr. Edwards getting it somehow, you know, in relation to some 22 other case and then it appears in discovery in this case. And 23 what it looks like is, you

ing to conceal that from the jury or are we going to present 7 it to them? Well, the Second Circuit case that your Honor is 8 well familiar with, LiButti, sets out the factors that have 9 determined that issue, and one of the things we hear from the 10 defendant is, oh, it's never been applied in a

, I don't know who the source of any of that information is. This is yet another piece of information that has appeared, I'm presuming through Mr. Edwards getting it somehow, you know, in relation to some other case and then it appears in discovery in this case. And what it looks like is, you know, a

we going to conceal that from the jury or are we going to present it to them? Well, the Second Circuit case that your Honor is well familiar with, LiButti, sets out the factors that have determined that issue, and one of the things we hear from the defendant is, oh, it's never been applied in a case l

y, I don't know who the source of any of that information is. This is yet another piece of information that has appeared, I'm presuming through Mr. Edwards getting it somehow, you know, in relation to some other case and then it appears in discovery in this case. And what it looks like is, you know, a

we going to conceal that from the jury or are we going to present it to them? Well, the Second Circuit case that your Honor is well familiar with, LiButti, sets out the factors that have determined that issue, and one of the things we hear from the defendant is, oh, it's never been applied in a case l