Epstein Secrets

AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. cor.50.2929aufactigIVP111, CASE NO. • A Aq SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and .M., individually, Defendants. COMPL CO Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned

ant, ROTHSTEIN and Stuall osenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

at ROTHSTEIN was utilizing RRA as a front for the mass selling an alleged interest or investment in the Ci • Epstein. 27. Further evidencing that EDWARDA possibly other attorneys of RRA) knew or should have known and participated in the continuation of the massive Ponzi scheme, a front-page Palm Beac

category and type of.offense listed below: ion only enii - riain ereini I 0 to 5 days _X___ Petty II 6 to 10 days Minor III 11 to 20 days Misdem. IV 21 to 60 days Felony V 61 days and over 6. Has this case been previously filed in this District Court? (Yes or No) ..No- —. If yes: Jud

spiracy created and run by Scott Rothstein has been exposed. On Monday, Mr. Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein, his partner Brad Edwards, and others with tortuous and fraudulent abuses of process that resulted in serious injury to Mr. Epstein. A copy of the Complaint is enclosed with

Rothstein crimes, is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees. As a lawsuit brought by some of the investors' claims, Rothstein and his partner Edwards used Jeffrey Epstein as bait. The litigation strategy, media pronouncements, and investigatory initiatives of Rothstein and Edwards were calculated

FLORIDA &WHEYSett* Plaintiff; v. Complex Litigation, Fla: k cht Pro. 1201 CASE NO. pn 50 2009CAO' -1Oe)"4B SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indliricluallYt BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, and L;,M;,. Individually, Defendants. COPY RECEIVED FOR FPLING DEC Ti itgag orfArt6N M. POCK COMPLAINT 0Ingfil% ciPMPTROIVIR

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

te category and type of offense listed below puck onlf OM (the& atone) I 0 to 5 days __X___ Petty II 8 to 10 days Minor III 11 to 20 days Misdem. if 21 to 60 days 61 days and over Felony 6. Has this case been previously filed In this District Court? (Yes or No) Na ___ If yes: Judge:

r 2007 4 EFTA00179472 %AO! 10 (Rev 04/07) Subpoena to Testify Before Grand Jury UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: Bradley Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 E Las Olas Blvd Ste 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FGJ 08-1103(

l Division Chief Northern Division From Assistant U.SLMItifipi v This memorandum seeks permission to issue a subpoena to attorney Brad Edwards ("Edwards") for records relating to the investigation Operation Stolen Globe. Edwards is willing to produce all of these items voluntarily. For liability reas

ulk of what is sought by the proposed subpoena to Attorney Edwards. 'From the description, it appears that he discl

ategory and type of offense listed below: tot only an) (Cheek only one) I 0 to 5 days —X-- Petty II 6 to 10 days Minor III 11 to 20 days Misdem. IV 21 to 60 days Felony V 61 days and over 6. Has this case been previously filed in this District Court? (Yes or No) No If yes: Judge C

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. 50 2009 CA 0 h 03 \MCCOMB COPY RECEIVED FOR FILING oic 0 1Mg EMIVION It PUCK COMPLAINT Gl

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

gory and type of offense listed below: (Chock tati orwol (Chock My one) I 0 to 5 days _X__ Petty II 6 to 10 days Minor III 11 to 20 days Misdem. IV 21 to 60 days Felony V 61 days and over 6. Has this case been previously filed in this District Court? (Yes or No) _No — If yes: Judge:

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. 50 2009 CA 0 b 0 3 MOUE 4) COPY RECEIVED FOR HUNG DEC u ( 2008 sriesnoN Ii poCK COMPLAINT p

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

ory and type of offense listed below. (Check odor 0001 (Check WI err( I 0 to 5 days ___X___ Petty II 6 to 10 days Minor III 11 to 20 days Misdem. Felony IV 21 to 60 days V 61 days and over 6. Has this case been previously filed in this District Court? (Yes or No) _No__ If yes: Judge: