Epstein Secrets

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND IN LIMINE OF UNRELATED

ments and amounts and for a finding that such are inadmissible evidence, and states: INTRODUCTION Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") represented three plaintiffs who brought tort claims seeking money damages against Epstein. Edwards possesses the confidential settlement agreeme

is error if we were not permitted to talk about what Mr. Epstein's motive was for taking the extraordinary step of filing a baseless claim against Bradley Edwards. THE COURT: Well, until we get into, Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00805183 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's ore genus motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: 1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defen

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA04080

, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. I East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fon Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. LS Law Fi

ward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 42

ns in Paragraph 5 contain annotations that are wholly inapposite, unprincipled, needlessly inflammatory, and serve no purpose other than to bolster Counter-Plaintiff's allegations and as such no response is warranted. 6. Epstein denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 and demands strict proof thereof. 7.

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-

DER AND ADJUDGE that: 1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") shall produce to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") the following: a. The number of claims settled by Jeffrey Epstein regarding individuals who alleged to be victims of sexual misconduct by Epstein

EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's ore genus motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: 1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defen

& APPELLATE LAW LINK& ROCKENBACH, PA August 14, 2018 Jeffrey Epstein 6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Re: Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards File No.: 2.0001 Dear Jeffrey: 1555 Palm Beach Lakes, Blvd., Suite 930 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 TEL: (561) 847-4408 I FAX: (561) 855.2891 Atta

s to what the evidence will show into two subsections: (a) that J. Epstein did not violate the November 30, 2010 Order; and (b) that Farmer Jaffe, Edwards, and Intervenors have sustained no actual, compensatory losses, encompassing 07/25/18 SJL Work on preparation for two-day hearing In front of Jud

lyze, and scrutinize multiple relevant case documents, including lengthy transcript of the Math 8, 2018 hearing involving Fowler White disk issue, Counter-Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Show Cause in bankruptcy court and Bankruptcy Court's Order to Show Cause, pertinent Complaints filed in Circuit Court case an

UIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendant(s). SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION DATED DECEMBER 9, 2011 Bradley J. E

e available for inspection and copying in accordance with Counter-Plaintiff's Response to Request to Produce dated January 6, 2012. EFTA00624845 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Supplemental Response to Epstein's Request for Production dated December 9, 2011 1 HEREBY CERTIFY th

control of the Counter- Plaintiff are attached to the extent such documents were to be made available for inspection and copying in accordance with Counter-Plaintiff's Response to Request to Produce dated January 6, 2012. EFTA00624845 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Supplemental Response

) 8354691 June 4, 2014 John R. Beranek, Esquire AUSLEY & McMULLEN, P.A. Post Office Box 391 Tallahassee, FL 32302 Re: Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Dear John: Enclosed please find the following: 1. Our Motion for Summary Judgment (w/o attachments) 2. Scarola's Memorandum in Opposition (w/o

nt (w/o attachments) 2. Scarola's Memorandum in Opposition (w/o attachments) 3. Transcript of the hearing on our Motion for Summary Judgment 4. Counter-Plaintiff's two Notices of Supplemental Authority 5. Order Granting our Motion for Summary Judgment 6. Final Judgment Please note that the second "Supplemen